Jones Steven Huntley, Hare Dougal Julian, Evershed Kate
Academic Division of Clinical Psychology, University of Manchester, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Bipolar Disord. 2005 Apr;7(2):176-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2005.00187.x.
Theoretical accounts and psychological interventions for bipolar disorder indicate that disruption of circadian rhythms is important, both in affective episodes and as a vulnerability factor in subsyndromal periods. This study aims at assessing both circadian activity and sleep patterns using actigraphy within a bipolar sample experiencing low levels of subsyndromal symptoms. It is hypothesized that such participants will display circadian activity disruption in spite of low levels of symptoms.
This study employed a mixed design with cross-sectional assessment of mood and week-long (7-day) recording of actigraphy data. All clinical participants were psychiatric outpatients within a UK NHS Hospital. Nineteen bipolar patients and 19 age- and gender-matched controls wore an actigraph for 7 days to obtain sleep and circadian activity data. SCID was used to confirm DSM-IV diagnostic status. Self-report measures of mood were obtained from both groups.
Bipolar patients were found to have less stable and more variable circadian activity patterns than controls. Regression analysis indicated that variability alone was a significant independent predictor of diagnostic group. There was evidence from raw activity data that bipolar patients were also less active than controls. These differences were not associated with levels of subsyndromal symptoms. Bipolar patients did not differ from controls on any of the sleep indices used.
Circadian activity disruption is apparent in bipolar patients even when not acutely ill. This finding is not associated with the presence of sleep disturbance. Should such patterns be replicated interventions to address both circadian instability and individual attributions for the effects of such instability are likely to be relevant to successful psychological interventions.
双相情感障碍的理论阐释和心理干预表明,昼夜节律紊乱在情感发作期以及作为亚综合征期的一个易患因素都很重要。本研究旨在使用活动记录仪评估一组亚综合征症状水平较低的双相情感障碍患者的昼夜活动和睡眠模式。研究假设是,尽管症状水平较低,但这些参与者仍会表现出昼夜活动紊乱。
本研究采用混合设计,对情绪进行横断面评估,并对活动记录仪数据进行为期一周(7天)的记录。所有临床参与者均为英国国民健康服务体系(NHS)医院的精神科门诊患者。19名双相情感障碍患者以及19名年龄和性别匹配的对照组人员佩戴活动记录仪7天,以获取睡眠和昼夜活动数据。使用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版(SCID)来确认诊断状态。两组均采用自我报告的情绪测量方法。
发现双相情感障碍患者的昼夜活动模式比对照组更不稳定且变化更大。回归分析表明,仅变异性就是诊断组的一个显著独立预测因素。原始活动数据显示,双相情感障碍患者的活动也比对照组少。这些差异与亚综合征症状水平无关。在使用的任何睡眠指标上,双相情感障碍患者与对照组均无差异。
即使在非急性发病期双相情感障碍患者的昼夜活动紊乱也很明显。这一发现与睡眠障碍的存在无关。如果此类模式得到重复验证,那么针对昼夜节律不稳定以及个体对这种不稳定影响的归因的干预措施可能与成功的心理干预相关。