Leong Trevor, Willis David, Joon Daryl Lim, Condron Sara, Hui Andrew, Ngan Samuel Y K
Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, St Andrews Place, East Melbourne, Vic. 3002, Australia.
Radiother Oncol. 2005 Mar;74(3):301-6. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.01.006.
Many radiation oncologists are reluctant to use anteroposterior-posteroanterior (AP-PA) field arrangements when treating gastric cancer with adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy due to concerns about normal tissue toxicity, particularly in relation to the kidneys and spinal cord. In this report, we describe a multiple-field conformal radiotherapy technique, and compare this technique to the more commonly used AP-PA technique that was used in the recently reported Intergroup study (INT0116).
Fifteen patients with stages II-IV adenocarcinoma of the stomach were treated with adjuvant postoperative chemoradiotherapy using a standardised 3D conformal radiotherapy technique that consisted of a 'split-field', mono-isocentric arrangement employing 6 radiation fields. For each patient, a second radiotherapy treatment plan was generated utilising AP-PA fields. The two techniques were then compared for target volume coverage and dose to normal tissues using dose volume histogram (DVH) analysis.
The conformal technique provides more adequate coverage of the target volume with 99% of the planning target volume (PTV) receiving 95% of the prescribed dose, compared to 93% using AP-PA fields. Comparative DVHs for the right kidney, left kidney and spinal cord demonstrate lower radiation doses using the conformal technique, and although the liver dose is higher, it is still well below liver tolerance.
3D conformal radiotherapy produces superior dose distributions and reduced radiation doses to the kidneys and spinal cord compared to AP-PA techniques, with the potential to reduce treatment toxicity.
许多放射肿瘤学家在对胃癌进行术后辅助放疗时,因担心正常组织毒性,尤其是与肾脏和脊髓相关的毒性,而不愿使用前后-后前(AP-PA)野照射方案。在本报告中,我们描述了一种多野适形放疗技术,并将该技术与最近报道的国际协作组研究(INT0116)中使用的更常用的AP-PA技术进行比较。
15例II-IV期胃腺癌患者接受术后辅助放化疗,采用标准化的三维适形放疗技术,该技术由一个“分割野”、单等中心排列组成,使用6个放射野。对每位患者,利用AP-PA野生成第二个放疗治疗计划。然后使用剂量体积直方图(DVH)分析比较这两种技术对靶区的覆盖情况以及对正常组织的剂量。
适形技术能更充分地覆盖靶区,99%的计划靶区体积(PTV)接受95%的处方剂量,而使用AP-PA野时这一比例为93%。右肾、左肾和脊髓的比较DVH显示,适形技术的放射剂量更低,虽然肝脏剂量较高,但仍远低于肝脏耐受剂量。
与AP-PA技术相比,三维适形放疗产生更优的剂量分布,降低了对肾脏和脊髓的放射剂量,有可能降低治疗毒性。