Worley Paul, Prideaux David, Strasser Roger, March Robyn, Worley Elizabeth
Flinders University, Rural Clinical School, Adelaide, Australia.
Med Teach. 2004 Nov;26(7):594-8. doi: 10.1080/01421590412331285397.
As medical schools make use of an increasing variety of clinical teaching settings, it is of interest to find that that there is very little published research that explores the actual learning activities undertaken by students in different environments. This study was designed to describe and analyse a typical week for students learning the same curricular material in one of three Australian settings: an urban tertiary teaching hospital, a remote secondary referral hospital and a rural community-based programme. Twenty-eight students completed week-long learning logs in weeks 9 and 35 of a 40-week academic year. Each student recorded his or her activity in 15-minute intervals for each week. Analysis of these data revealed that, compared with the hospital-based students, the community-based students reported greater patient contact, more time spent in clinical settings and increased time supervised by experienced clinicians. Whilst the community-based students valued their learning in clinical settings more highly than the learning they undertook at their home, the opposite was found for the tertiary hospital-based students. This study, the first to compare student activity in these three prototypical settings in the medical education literature, provides empirical evidence supporting community-based programmes as credible alternatives to traditional teaching hospital-based environments.
随着医学院校利用越来越多不同的临床教学环境,有意思的是,很少有已发表的研究探讨学生在不同环境中实际开展的学习活动。本研究旨在描述和分析澳大利亚三种环境之一中学习相同课程材料的学生的典型一周:城市三级教学医院、偏远二级转诊医院和农村社区项目。28名学生在40周学年的第9周和第35周完成了为期一周的学习日志。每名学生每周以15分钟为间隔记录自己的活动。对这些数据的分析表明,与以医院为基础的学生相比,以社区为基础的学生报告了更多的患者接触、在临床环境中花费更多时间以及由经验丰富的临床医生监督的时间增加。虽然以社区为基础的学生对在临床环境中的学习评价高于在家中的学习,但以三级医院为基础的学生情况则相反。本研究是医学教育文献中首次比较这三种典型环境中学生活动的研究,提供了实证证据,支持以社区为基础的项目作为传统教学医院环境的可靠替代方案。