Worley Paul, Prideaux David, Strasser Roger, Magarey Anne, March Robyn
Flinders University Rural Clinical School, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Med Educ. 2006 Feb;40(2):109-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02366.x.
Flinders University has developed the Parallel Rural Community Curriculum (PRCC), a full year clinical curriculum based in rural general practice in South Australia. The examination performance of students on this course has been shown to be higher than that of their tertiary hospital-based peers.
To compare the learning experiences of students in the community-based programme with those of students in the tertiary hospital in order to explain these improved academic outcomes.
A case study was undertaken, using an interpretivist perspective, with 3 structured interviews carried out over 2 academic years with each of 6 students from the community-based programme and 16 students from the tertiary hospital. The taped interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically using NUD*IST software.
The community-based programme was successful in immersing the students in the clinical environment in a meaningful way. Four key themes were found in the data. These represented clear differences between the experiences of the community-based and hospital-based students. These differences involved: the value that students perceived they were given by supervising doctors and their patients; the extent to which the student's presence realised a synergy between the work of the university and the health service; opportunities for students to meet the aspirations of both the community and government policy, and opportunities for students to learn how professional expectations can mesh with their own personal values.
This study has provided empirical evidence for the importance of the concept of symbiosis in understanding quality in medical education.
弗林德斯大学开发了平行农村社区课程(PRCC),这是一门基于南澳大利亚农村全科医疗的全年临床课程。已证明修读该课程的学生考试成绩高于在三级医院学习的同龄人。
比较社区课程学生与三级医院学生的学习经历,以解释这些改善的学业成绩。
采用案例研究,从解释主义视角出发,在两个学年里对社区课程的6名学生和三级医院的16名学生分别进行3次结构化访谈。对录音访谈进行转录,并使用NUD*IST软件进行主题分析。
社区课程成功地让学生以有意义的方式融入临床环境。数据中发现了四个关键主题。这些主题体现了社区课程学生和医院课程学生经历的明显差异。这些差异包括:学生认为带教医生和患者给予他们的价值;学生的参与在多大程度上实现了大学工作与卫生服务之间的协同效应;学生满足社区和政府政策期望的机会,以及学生了解专业期望如何与个人价值观相契合的机会。
本研究为共生概念在理解医学教育质量方面的重要性提供了实证依据。