Hauck M L, Zalutsky M R
Department of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA.
Int J Hyperthermia. 2005 Feb;21(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/02656730410001695906.
Improving drug and macromolecular delivery of anti-cancer agents to tumours results in greater efficacy without increased toxicity. The current study was undertaken to assess the effects of the timing of injection of tumour specific and non-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) relative to a hyperthermia treatment on tumour and normal tissue uptake. Using a local hyperthermia protocol of 45 min at 43 degrees C, uptake in tumour and normal tissues was measured at 1, 4, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after injection. An anti-tenascin chimeric mAb, ch81C6, served as the specific mAb in a D-54 MG glioma xenograft mouse model. The chimeric mAb chTPS3.2 served as the control. A five-to-eight-fold increase in uptake of the tumour-targeted mAb was achieved in the heated tumours when compared with the non-heated tumours at 1 h. Differences in absolute tumour uptake of the specific mAb between the mice injected prior to hyperthermia and mice injected post-hyperthermia were seen only at 1 and 12 h. The median uptakes in the tumours of mice injected pre-heat were 25%ID/g at 1 h and 43.5%ID/g at 12 h, while in the animals injected post-hyperthermia the median uptakes were 45.5%ID/g and 80.2%ID/g, respectively. Blood levels of both the specific and non-specific mAbs were consistently higher over the initial 12 h period in the mice injected post-hyperthermia. Normal tissue uptake was also increased at most time points in the mice injected post-hyperthermia. The clinical importance of the differences in specific mAb uptake in tumour detected statistically at 1 and 12 h is questionable, given the highly variable nature of mAb uptake in vivo. Tumour targeting mAbs administered in combination with heat may be injected either prior to or immediately following hyperthermia treatment, with the expectation that levels of uptake in tumour will be relatively equivalent. Absolute normal tissue levels will be higher in patients receiving the mAb post-hyperthermia.
提高抗癌药物和大分子向肿瘤的递送效率可在不增加毒性的情况下提高疗效。本研究旨在评估相对于热疗,肿瘤特异性和非特异性单克隆抗体(mAb)注射时间对肿瘤和正常组织摄取的影响。采用在43℃下进行45分钟的局部热疗方案,在注射后1、4、12、24、48和72小时测量肿瘤和正常组织的摄取情况。在D-54 MG胶质瘤异种移植小鼠模型中,抗腱生蛋白嵌合单克隆抗体ch81C6作为特异性单克隆抗体。嵌合单克隆抗体chTPS3.2作为对照。与未加热的肿瘤相比,在加热的肿瘤中,肿瘤靶向单克隆抗体的摄取在1小时时增加了5至8倍。在热疗前注射的小鼠和热疗后注射的小鼠之间,特异性单克隆抗体在肿瘤中的绝对摄取差异仅在1小时和12小时时可见。热疗前注射的小鼠肿瘤中的中位摄取量在1小时时为25%ID/g,在12小时时为43.5%ID/g,而在热疗后注射的动物中,中位摄取量分别为45.5%ID/g和80.2%ID/g。在热疗后注射的小鼠中,特异性和非特异性单克隆抗体的血药浓度在最初12小时内一直较高。在热疗后注射的小鼠中,大多数时间点的正常组织摄取也增加了。鉴于单克隆抗体在体内摄取的高度变异性,在1小时和12小时时统计学检测到的肿瘤中特异性单克隆抗体摄取差异的临床重要性值得怀疑。与热疗联合使用的肿瘤靶向单克隆抗体可以在热疗前或热疗后立即注射,预期肿瘤摄取水平将相对相当。接受热疗后注射单克隆抗体的患者,正常组织的绝对水平会更高。