• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伐昔洛韦预防肾移植后巨细胞病毒感染的成本效益分析。

The cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis with valaciclovir in the management of cytomegalovirus after renal transplantation.

作者信息

Legendre Christophe, Beard Stephen M, Crochard Anne, Lebranchu Yvon, Pouteil-Noble Claire, Richter Anke, Durand-Zaleski Isabelle

机构信息

St. Louis Hospital, Paris, France.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2005 Jun;6(2):172-82. doi: 10.1007/s10198-004-0275-9.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-004-0275-9
PMID:15765243
Abstract

Prophylaxis-based antiviral treatment and intensive monitoring followed by pre-emptive antiviral treatment are both commonly used management strategies to reduce risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection following renal transplantation. This study employed a decision-model approach using published efficacy data and information from a recent survey of French clinical practice to consider the relative costs and outcomes associated with CMV prevention strategies for high-risk patient groups. The cost per case of treating tissue invasive and symptomatic CMV disease was estimated at euro 15,431 and euro 10,852, respectively. In the highest infection-risk patient group (positive donor with no previous CMV history) prophylactic oral valaciclovir was shown to avoid the greatest number of CMV disease cases (35 cases per 100 transplanted patients) and reduced the overall CMV-related costs per transplanted patient by around 14% over a'wait-and-treat' baseline strategy. In contrast, intensive monitoring and preemptive treatment resulted in a much higher cost per transplanted patient. This analysis suggests that prophylactic treatment remains the most cost-effective approach to the management of CMV in renal-transplanted patients. Further comparative studies between prophylactic and pre-emptive treatment would be a valuable addition to the current evidence based on CMV prevention.

摘要

基于预防的抗病毒治疗以及随后进行抢先抗病毒治疗的强化监测,都是肾移植后降低巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染风险常用的管理策略。本研究采用决策模型方法,利用已发表的疗效数据以及来自法国近期临床实践调查的信息,来考量高危患者群体CMV预防策略的相关成本和结果。治疗组织侵袭性和有症状CMV疾病的每例成本估计分别为15431欧元和10852欧元。在感染风险最高的患者群体(供体阳性且既往无CMV病史)中,预防性口服伐昔洛韦可避免最多的CMV疾病病例(每100例移植患者中有35例),并且与“等待并治疗”的基线策略相比,可使每位移植患者的总体CMV相关成本降低约14%。相比之下,强化监测和抢先治疗导致每位移植患者的成本要高得多。该分析表明,预防性治疗仍然是肾移植患者CMV管理中最具成本效益的方法。预防性治疗和抢先治疗之间的进一步比较研究将是对当前基于CMV预防的证据的宝贵补充。

相似文献

1
The cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis with valaciclovir in the management of cytomegalovirus after renal transplantation.伐昔洛韦预防肾移植后巨细胞病毒感染的成本效益分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2005 Jun;6(2):172-82. doi: 10.1007/s10198-004-0275-9.
2
A decision-analytic economic evaluation of valaciclovir prophylaxis for the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in renal transplantation.伐昔洛韦预防肾移植中巨细胞病毒感染和疾病的决策分析经济评估。
Clin Transplant. 2004 Jun;18(3):312-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2004.00168.x.
3
Cost-effectiveness model of cytomegalovirus management strategies in renal transplantation. Comparing valaciclovir prophylaxis with current practice.肾移植中巨细胞病毒管理策略的成本效益模型。将伐昔洛韦预防与当前实践进行比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Sep;18(3):239-51. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200018030-00004.
4
The economic value of valacyclovir prophylaxis in transplantation.伐昔洛韦预防在移植中的经济价值。
J Infect Dis. 2002 Oct 15;186 Suppl 1:S116-22. doi: 10.1086/342961.
5
A comparative randomised study of valacyclovir vs. oral ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients.伐昔洛韦与口服更昔洛韦用于肾移植受者巨细胞病毒预防的比较随机研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005 Sep;11(9):736-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01215.x.
6
A randomized prospective controlled trial of oral ganciclovir versus oral valacyclovir for prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus disease after renal transplantation.口服更昔洛韦与口服伐昔洛韦预防肾移植后巨细胞病毒病的随机前瞻性对照试验。
Transpl Int. 2002 Dec;15(12):615-22. doi: 10.1007/s00147-002-0475-0. Epub 2002 Nov 5.
7
The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of valacyclovir in cytomegalovirus prevention in solid organ transplantation.伐昔洛韦在实体器官移植中预防巨细胞病毒感染的疗效及成本效益
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Dec;14(6):771-9. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.965157. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
8
Low-dose valaciclovir prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus disease in renal transplant recipients.低剂量伐昔洛韦预防肾移植受者巨细胞病毒病
Transpl Int. 2003 Oct;16(10):726-9. doi: 10.1007/s00147-003-0612-4. Epub 2003 Jun 24.
9
Valaciclovir prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in renal transplantation: an economic evaluation.伐昔洛韦预防肾移植受者巨细胞病毒感染和疾病的经济学评价
Transplantation. 2000 Nov 27;70(10):1463-8. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200011270-00012.
10
Aciclovir or ganciclovir universal prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplantation: an economic analysis.阿昔洛韦或更昔洛韦对肝移植中巨细胞病毒感染的普遍预防:一项经济学分析。
Intern Med J. 2004 Jul;34(7):410-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2004.00567.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Cost-effectiveness of Valganciclovir Prophylaxis Versus Preemptive Therapy in CMV R+ Kidney Transplant Recipients Over the First Year Posttransplantation.移植后第一年,缬更昔洛韦预防治疗与抢先治疗对巨细胞病毒R+肾移植受者的成本效益分析
Transplant Direct. 2024 Jul 26;10(8):e1678. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001678. eCollection 2024 Aug.