McCarty J, Hernon Y, Linn L, Therasse D G, Molina A, Bleile N
California Medical Research Group, Fresno.
Clin Ther. 1992 Jan-Feb;14(1):30-40.
Loracarbef, a member of a unique class of beta-lactam compounds (carbacephems), has excellent chemical and beta-lactamase stability, as well as documented clinical effectiveness against a broad spectrum of bacteria. Ten-day treatment regimens of loracarbef (200-mg capsule BID or 15 mg/kg/day suspension) and penicillin VK (250-mg capsule QID or 20 mg/kg/day suspension) were compared in the treatment of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) pharyngitis and tonsillitis. Adults (greater than or equal to 12 years of age) were administered loracarbef (n = 58) or penicillin (n = 58) in a double-blind, randomized, parallel study of clinical and bacteriologic response to treatment. Favorable clinical responses among qualified (evaluable) patients in the loracarbef-treated group (46/47; 97.9%) were similar to those for evaluable patients in the penicillin-treated group (43/43; 100%). Forty-one of 47 (87.2%) of the evaluable loracarbef-treated patients and 100% (43/43) of the evaluable penicillin-treated patients had negative posttherapy throat cultures for GABHS. Thirty-nine evaluable patients in each treatment group were assessed 28 to 35 days after completion of therapy: 2.6% of patients in each group experienced relapse of symptoms; and 7.7% of loracarbef-treated patients had positive cultures, compared to 12.8% of penicillin-treated patients. Two (1.9%) loracarbef-treated patients with rashes and one (0.9%) penicillin-treated patient with diarrhea withdrew from the study due to these adverse events. Diarrhea, the most frequently occurring adverse event during therapy in the loracarbef group, was reported by 8.6% of the loracarbef group and by 5.2% of the penicillin group. These data support the conclusion that loracarbef is comparable in safety and efficacy to penicillin VK for the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis and tonsillitis in adults.
氯碳头孢是一类独特的β-内酰胺化合物(碳头孢烯类)的成员,具有出色的化学稳定性和β-内酰胺酶稳定性,并且有文献记载其对多种细菌具有临床疗效。在治疗A组β溶血性链球菌(GABHS)咽炎和扁桃体炎方面,对氯碳头孢(200毫克胶囊,每日两次或15毫克/千克/天混悬液)和青霉素V钾(250毫克胶囊,每日四次或20毫克/千克/天混悬液)的10天治疗方案进行了比较。在一项关于治疗的临床和细菌学反应的双盲、随机、平行研究中,对成人(年龄大于或等于12岁)给予氯碳头孢(n = 58)或青霉素(n = 58)。氯碳头孢治疗组中合格(可评估)患者的良好临床反应(46/47;97.9%)与青霉素治疗组中可评估患者的反应(43/43;100%)相似。氯碳头孢治疗的可评估患者中有47例中的41例(87.2%)以及青霉素治疗的可评估患者中的100%(43/43)在治疗后GABHS咽拭子培养结果为阴性。在每个治疗组中,对39例可评估患者在治疗完成后28至35天进行了评估:每组中有2.6%的患者出现症状复发;氯碳头孢治疗的患者中有7.7%培养结果为阳性,而青霉素治疗的患者中有12.8%培养结果为阳性。两名(1.9%)接受氯碳头孢治疗的患者出现皮疹,一名(0.9%)接受青霉素治疗的患者出现腹泻,由于这些不良事件退出了研究。腹泻是氯碳头孢组治疗期间最常出现的不良事件,氯碳头孢组有8.6%的患者报告出现腹泻,青霉素组有5.2%的患者报告出现腹泻。这些数据支持以下结论:在治疗成人链球菌性咽炎和扁桃体炎方面,氯碳头孢在安全性和疗效上与青霉素V钾相当。