Lang Christopher C, Santinelli Vincenzo, Augello Giuseppe, Ferro Amedeo, Gugliotta Filippo, Gulletta Simone, Vicedomini Gabriele, Mesas Cézar, Paglino Gabriele, Sala Simone, Sora Nicoleta, Mazzone Patrizio, Manguso Francesco, Pappone Carlo
Division of Cardiac Pacing and Arrhythmias, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Mar 15;45(6):868-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.057.
Few data have been published on transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with mitral valve prostheses. Thus, we sought to report our experience.
Ablation is an effective treatment for AF. Patients with prosthetic mitral valves represent a special group because of an increased risk from the ablation procedure due to the possibility of damage to the prosthetic valve.
Between July 2001 and July 2003, 26 patients with mitral valve prostheses (MVP) underwent circumferential pulmonary vein ablation for AF. A matched group of 52 ablated patients without MVP acted as control subjects. After a blanking period of three months, a follow-up of 12 months was considered for MVP patients and controls. Holter recordings were performed in all subjects at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Radiation exposure was higher in the MVP group, with fluoroscopy times of 35.3 +/- 21 min versus 20.9 +/- 15 min in controls. At the end of follow-up, 73% of MVP patients were in sinus rhythm, compared with 75% of controls. Atrial tachycardia occurred in six (23%) MVP patients, requiring repeat ablation in three, and one (2%) control subject, which settled without treatment. One transient ischemic attack and one femoral pseudoaneurysm occurred in the MVP group. No complications occurred in the control group.
Ablation of AF in patients with MVP is feasible, with outcomes similar to those of standard patients. Complications were higher among MVP patients with a greater radiation exposure and a higher incidence of post-ablation atrial tachycardia.
