Mackey Rachel H, Kuller Lewis H, Sutton-Tyrrell Kim, Evans Rhobert W, Holubkov Richard, Matthews Karen A
Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, 130 DeSoto Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Mar 14;165(5):510-5. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.5.510.
The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) clinical trial found no reduction in coronary heart disease events among hormone therapy (HT) users despite an improvement in lipid levels. We hypothesized that a lack of benefit of HT on atherosclerosis would be better explained by the lipoprotein subclasses than by standard lipid levels. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated differences in coronary calcification, lipids, and lipoprotein subclasses among HT users and nonusers in a longitudinal study of the menopause.
Lipoprotein subclasses determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and coronary artery calcification (CAC) determined by electron beam computed tomography were compared between HT users (49%) and nonusers among 243 women, approximately 8 years postmenopausal, from the Healthy Women Study.
The distribution of CAC scores was not significantly different between HT users and nonusers. As expected, HT users had higher levels of large high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles and large very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles. However, despite lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels among HT users, there were no significant differences between HT users and nonusers in any LDL subclass measures, including particle size or concentration. Regardless of HT use, women with CAC had higher levels of large VLDL and small LDL particles, higher LDL particle concentration, and smaller mean LDL size compared with women with no detectable CAC.
Compared with nonusers, HT users had higher levels of VLDL particles (triglycerides) and did not have a better LDL subclass distribution, which may explain the failure of HT to be associated with a difference in CAC in our study or with a reduction in coronary heart disease risk in randomized clinical trials.
妇女健康倡议(WHI)临床试验发现,尽管激素疗法(HT)使用者的血脂水平有所改善,但冠心病事件并未减少。我们推测,与标准血脂水平相比,脂蛋白亚类能更好地解释HT对动脉粥样硬化缺乏益处的原因。为了验证这一假设,我们在一项绝经纵向研究中评估了HT使用者和非使用者在冠状动脉钙化、血脂和脂蛋白亚类方面的差异。
在健康女性研究中,对243名绝经后约8年的女性进行了比较,其中HT使用者占49%,非使用者占51%。通过核磁共振波谱法测定脂蛋白亚类,通过电子束计算机断层扫描测定冠状动脉钙化(CAC)。
HT使用者和非使用者之间的CAC评分分布没有显著差异。正如预期的那样,HT使用者的大高密度脂蛋白(HDL)颗粒和大极低密度脂蛋白(VLDL)颗粒水平较高。然而,尽管HT使用者的低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇水平较低,但在任何LDL亚类指标(包括颗粒大小或浓度)上,HT使用者和非使用者之间均无显著差异。无论是否使用HT,与未检测到CAC的女性相比,有CAC的女性的大VLDL和小LDL颗粒水平更高,LDL颗粒浓度更高,平均LDL大小更小。
与非使用者相比,HT使用者的VLDL颗粒(甘油三酯)水平较高,且LDL亚类分布并未更好,这可能解释了在我们的研究中HT未能与CAC差异相关联,或在随机临床试验中未能降低冠心病风险的原因。