Briffod M, Spyratos F, Hacène K, Tubiana-Hulin M, Pallud C, Gilles F, Rouëssé J
Department of Pathology, Centre René Huguenin de Lutte Contre le Cancer, St-Cloud, France.
Cytometry. 1992;13(3):250-8. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990130306.
Flow cytometric (FCM) DNA and S-Phase (S%) analyses were compared to computerized image analysis (SAMBA 2005) in 27 breast carcinomas (T3, N0-N1, M0) treated by 3 cycles of preoperative Adriamycin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (AVCMF) chemotherapy (CT). Twelve carcinomas had shown objective regression and 15 no regression. Samples studied were obtained by sequential fine-needle cytopunctures. Comparing DNA profiles obtained by both methods before and after the first cycle, it appears that tumors can be divided into 3 groups. In the first group (10 cases), no changes were observed after the first cycle of CT. These tumors before treatment had either single DNA peak without cells in S% and G2M or a major peak with a small S% and G2M peak. The second group (9 cases) showed some changes in DNA profiles with an increased G2M peak but no additional values; these tumors before treatment had a small S% and a G2M peak. In the third group (8 cases), before treatment, all were non-diploid with high S% and high G2M. After the first cycle, all showed obvious changes in DNA profiles with a decrease of the G0/G1 peak and an increased S% and G2M with dispersed additional values along the scale in (G2M) x 2 and (G2M) x 4 regions. When changes were compared to tumor regression in the 1st and 2nd groups, 1/10 and 3/9 cases, respectively, were evaluated as objective regression. In the third group, all had objective regression (p less than 0.001). In most cases, a good correlation was observed with both methods.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
对27例乳腺癌(T3,N0 - N1,M0)进行了流式细胞术(FCM)DNA和S期(S%)分析,并与计算机图像分析(SAMBA 2005)进行比较。这些乳腺癌患者接受了3个周期的术前阿霉素、长春新碱、环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤、5 - 氟尿嘧啶(AVCMF)化疗(CT)。12例癌灶出现客观缓解,15例未缓解。研究样本通过连续细针穿刺获取。比较两种方法在第一个周期前后获得的DNA图谱,发现肿瘤可分为3组。第一组(10例)在第一个周期CT后未观察到变化。这些肿瘤在治疗前要么具有无S%和G2M期细胞的单一DNA峰,要么具有一个大峰及小的S%和G2M峰。第二组(9例)DNA图谱有一些变化,G2M峰增加但无其他变化;这些肿瘤在治疗前S%小且有G2M峰。第三组(8例)在治疗前均为非二倍体,S%和G2M高。第一个周期后,所有病例DNA图谱均有明显变化,G0/G1峰降低,S%和G2M增加,在(G2M)×2和(G2M)×4区域沿刻度有分散的额外值。将变化与第一组和第二组的肿瘤缓解情况比较,分别有1/10和3/9病例被评估为客观缓解。在第三组中,所有病例均有客观缓解(p小于0.001)。在大多数情况下,两种方法之间观察到良好的相关性。(摘要截断于250字)