Krämer Stephanie, Loof Tanja, Martini Sebastian, Rückert Matthias, Wang Yingrui, Böhler Torsten, Shimizu Fuijo, Kawachi Hiroshi, Neumayer Hans-H, Peters Harm
Department of Nephrology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Germany.
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2005 Aug;289(2):F359-68. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00442.2004. Epub 2005 Mar 15.
Tubulointerstitial inflammation and fibrosis are hallmarks of chronic progressive renal diseases. To characterize the functional interaction between cell infiltration and matrix expansion, this study compared the immunosuppressant mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), intended as primarily anti-inflammatory intervention, the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril, intended as primarily an anti-fibrotic drug, and a combination of both as anticipated anti-inflammatory/anti-fibrotic intervention. The model used was anti-thy1-induced chronic-progressive glomerulosclerosis (cGS) in the rat, where a brief anti-thy1-induced glomerular injury progresses spontaneously toward tubulointerstitial fibrosis and renal insufficiency. cGS was induced by injection of anti-thy1 antibody into uninephrectomized Wistar rats. One week after disease induction, animals were randomly assigned to the following groups: cGS, cGS plus MMF (20 mg.kg body wt(-1).day(-1)), cGS plus high-dose enalapril (12 mg.kg body wt(-1).day(-1)), and cGS plus both. At week 16 after disease induction, MMF or enalapril alone reduced signs of chronic renal disease significantly and similarly compared with the untreated cGS group. Variables measured included proteinuria, blood pressure, tubulointerstitial and glomerular matrix accumulation, expression of transforming growth factor-beta(1), fibronectin, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, infiltration of lymphocytes and macrophages, plasma creatinine and urea levels, and glomerular filtration rate. Combined MMF and enalapril treatment was not superior to single therapy. In conclusion, MMF slows the progression of chronic renal fibrosis and renal insufficiency as effectively as high-dose enalapril in the anti-thy1-induced chronic-progressive glomerulosclerosis model. The dual anti-inflammatory/anti-fibrotic intervention does not yield additive renoprotective effects, indicating that MMF and enalapril interfere with similar or very closely related pathways involved in progression of renal disease.
肾小管间质炎症和纤维化是慢性进行性肾脏疾病的特征。为了描述细胞浸润与基质扩张之间的功能相互作用,本研究比较了作为主要抗炎干预措施的免疫抑制剂霉酚酸酯(MMF)、作为主要抗纤维化药物的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂依那普利,以及两者联合作为预期的抗炎/抗纤维化干预措施。所使用的模型是大鼠抗thy1诱导的慢性进行性肾小球硬化(cGS),其中短暂的抗thy1诱导的肾小球损伤会自发地发展为肾小管间质纤维化和肾功能不全。通过向单侧肾切除的Wistar大鼠注射抗thy1抗体诱导cGS。疾病诱导1周后,将动物随机分为以下几组:cGS组、cGS加MMF组(20mg·kg体重-1·天-1)、cGS加高剂量依那普利组(12mg·kg体重-1·天-1)和cGS加两者联合组。在疾病诱导后第16周,单独使用MMF或依那普利与未治疗的cGS组相比,均显著且相似地减轻了慢性肾脏疾病的体征。所测量的变量包括蛋白尿、血压、肾小管间质和肾小球基质积聚、转化生长因子-β1、纤连蛋白和纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂-1的表达、淋巴细胞和巨噬细胞浸润、血浆肌酐和尿素水平以及肾小球滤过率。MMF和依那普利联合治疗并不优于单一治疗。总之,在抗thy1诱导的慢性进行性肾小球硬化模型中,MMF在减缓慢性肾纤维化和肾功能不全进展方面与高剂量依那普利同样有效。双重抗炎/抗纤维化干预并未产生额外的肾脏保护作用,这表明MMF和依那普利干扰了参与肾脏疾病进展的相似或非常密切相关的途径。