Casadei Riccardo, Perenze Barbara, Vescini Fabio, Piccoli Lida, Zanini Nicola, Minni Francesco
Department of Surgical and Anaestesiological Sciences, I Surgical Clinic, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Italy.
Chir Ital. 2004 Nov-Dec;56(6):843-8.
Surgical technique of total thyroidectomy is nowadays well known. Technology could determine some improvement of this kind of surgery. Two groups of patients that underwent total thyroidectomy were compared retrospectively. In group 1 we described 105 total thyroidectomies performed with ultrasonically activated shears; in group 2, 76 performed with conventional methods of haemostasis. Comparing the two groups for several parameters, it results that in the total thyroidectomies performed with ultrasonically actived shears, operative time is shorter of 24 minutes compared with conventional method (81 vs 105 minutes), the mean amount of intraoperative blood loss is smaller (70 ml vs 125 ml), the postoperative pain is less, the cosmetic result is better (length of incision 6 cm vs 10 cm) and the costs is not more expensive. Complications of thyroid surgery are similar between the two methods. The use of ultrasonically actived shears in total thyroidectomy is safe (no increase of complications) and useful because it reduces operative time, improves the recovery of the patient (less pain, better cosmetic results) and, finally, is not more expensive than conventional method of haemostasis.
如今,全甲状腺切除术的手术技术已广为人知。技术可以使这类手术得到一些改进。对两组接受全甲状腺切除术的患者进行了回顾性比较。在第1组中,我们描述了105例使用超声刀进行的全甲状腺切除术;在第2组中,76例采用传统止血方法。比较两组的几个参数,结果显示,与传统方法相比,使用超声刀进行的全甲状腺切除术手术时间缩短了24分钟(81分钟对105分钟),术中平均失血量更少(70毫升对125毫升),术后疼痛减轻,美容效果更好(切口长度6厘米对10厘米),且成本并不更高。两种方法甲状腺手术的并发症相似。在全甲状腺切除术中使用超声刀是安全的(并发症未增加)且有用,因为它缩短了手术时间,改善了患者的恢复情况(疼痛减轻、美容效果更好),最后,并不比传统止血方法更昂贵。