Chur-Hansen Anna, Koopowitz Leslie F
Department of Psychiatry at the Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, South Australia 5005.
Acad Psychiatry. 2005 Spring;29(1):66-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.29.1.66.
This paper describes the introduction of formative feedback into a psychiatry attachment at an Australian university and evaluates students' responses to that initiative.
Students were provided with formative feedback sessions employing a standardized instrument, also used at the end of the attachment for summative assessment. They were asked to both define formative feedback and rate its usefulness on a questionnaire, providing open-ended written comments where appropriate.
The concept and purpose of formative feedback were understood by 91.9% of the students who completed a questionnaire. The vast majority considered it to be useful, but some identified the need for constructive criticism and structured feedback as important characteristics of formative sessions.
Rigorous research is needed to establish whether formative feedback impacts summative assessments. However, it is clear that such feedback is desirable, in that it increases student confidence and direction. We encourage our colleagues to consider introducing and evaluating formative feedback into psychiatry curricula.
本文描述了在澳大利亚一所大学的精神病学实习中引入形成性反馈的情况,并评估了学生对该举措的反应。
为学生提供使用标准化工具的形成性反馈课程,该工具在实习结束时也用于总结性评估。要求他们在问卷中定义形成性反馈并对其有用性进行评分,并在适当的地方提供开放式书面评论。
完成问卷的学生中有91.9%理解了形成性反馈的概念和目的。绝大多数人认为它有用,但有些人认为建设性批评和结构化反馈是形成性课程的重要特征。
需要进行严谨的研究来确定形成性反馈是否会影响总结性评估。然而,很明显这种反馈是可取的,因为它增加了学生的信心和方向。我们鼓励同事们考虑在精神病学课程中引入和评估形成性反馈。