Simmons Leigh Ann, Wright David W
Family Studies Department, University of Kentucky, 305-A Funkhouser Building, Lexington, KY 40506-0054, USA.
J Health Soc Policy. 2004;19(2):59-80. doi: 10.1300/J045v19n02_03.
Mental disorders are the leading cause of disability worldwide, according to the World Health Organization (WHO, 1996). In a report on health indicators of premature death and disability, the World Bank concluded that mental health problems account for 8.1% of the global burden of disease (GBD). Industrialized nations have taken different approaches in applying innovations to mental health care and mental health care policy. This paper uses the K. McInnis-Dittrich model of policy analysis (Ginsberg, 1994) to analyze the approaches of the United Kingdom (U.K.) and the United States (U.S.) to mental health treatment, specifically examining the effects of the U.K.'s national practice guidelines and the U.S.'s lack of similar guidelines. Recommendations for changes in current U.S. mental health policy are presented.
根据世界卫生组织(1996年)的数据,精神障碍是全球致残的主要原因。在一份关于过早死亡和残疾的健康指标报告中,世界银行得出结论,心理健康问题占全球疾病负担(GBD)的8.1%。工业化国家在将创新应用于精神卫生保健和精神卫生保健政策方面采取了不同的方法。本文运用K. 麦金尼斯 - 迪特里希政策分析模型(金斯伯格,1994年)来分析英国和美国在精神卫生治疗方面的方法,特别考察英国国家实践指南的效果以及美国缺乏类似指南的情况。文中还提出了对美国当前精神卫生政策变革的建议。