• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Long-term treatment with losartan versus atenolol improves insulin sensitivity in hypertension: ICARUS, a LIFE substudy.

作者信息

Olsen Michael H, Fossum Eigil, Høieggen Aud, Wachtell Kristian, Hjerkinn Elsa, Nesbitt Shawna D, Andersen Ulrik B, Phillips Robert A, Gaboury Cynthia L, Ibsen Hans, Kjeldsen Sverre E, Julius Stevo

机构信息

Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2005 Apr;23(4):891-8. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000163160.60234.15.

DOI:10.1097/01.hjh.0000163160.60234.15
PMID:15775796
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Hypertension and insulin resistance might be associated through peripheral vascular hypertrophy/rarefaction which compromises skeletal muscle blood flow and decreases glucose uptake, inducing insulin resistance. We hypothesized that treatment with losartan as compared to atenolol would improve insulin sensitivity through regression of peripheral vascular hypertrophy/rarefaction.

METHODS

In 70 hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy, we measured minimal forearm vascular resistance (MFVR) by plethysmography and insulin sensitivity (M/IG) by a 2-h isoglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp at baseline and after 1, 2 and 3 years of blinded treatment with atenolol- or losartan-based regimens.

RESULTS

Blood pressures were reduced similarly in the two treatment groups. After 3 years, MFVR was increased (3.7 versus 3.2 mmHg x min x 100, P < 0.05) and M/IG decreased (8.6 versus 12.1 l/kg x mmol x min, P < 0.05) in patients treated with atenolol, whereas MFVR and M/IG were unchanged (3.5 versus 3.5 mmHg x min x 100 and 12.6 versus 11.1 l/kg x mmol x min, both P = NS) in patients treated with losartan. As compared to atenolol, losartan treatment was associated with less increase in MFVR (4.3 versus 27%, P < 0.05) and less decrease in M/IG (24 versus -14%, P < 0.01). The relative change in M/IG was inversely associated with the relative change in MFVR (r = -0.16, P < 0.05) independently of the relative change in body mass index (r = -0.29, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

As compared to atenolol, losartan treatment was associated with less peripheral vascular hypertrophy/rarefaction and higher insulin sensitivity. The relative change in MFVR and M/IG were inversely related, supporting the hypothesis that peripheral vascular changes in hypertension may induce insulin resistance. The ability of losartan to preserve insulin sensitivity may explain the lower incidence of new onset diabetes in patients treated with losartan in the LIFE study.

摘要

相似文献

1
Long-term treatment with losartan versus atenolol improves insulin sensitivity in hypertension: ICARUS, a LIFE substudy.
J Hypertens. 2005 Apr;23(4):891-8. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000163160.60234.15.
2
A possible link between endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance in hypertension. A LIFE substudy. Losartan Intervention For Endpoint-Reduction in Hypertension.
Blood Press. 2000;9(2-3):132-9. doi: 10.1080/080370500453474.
3
Does albuminuria predict cardiovascular outcome on treatment with losartan versus atenolol in hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy? A LIFE substudy.在伴有左心室肥厚的高血压患者中,与阿替洛尔相比,氯沙坦治疗时蛋白尿能否预测心血管结局?一项 LIFE 子研究。
J Hypertens. 2004 Sep;22(9):1805-11. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200409000-00026.
4
Are left ventricular mass, geometry and function related to vascular changes and/or insulin resistance in long-standing hypertension? ICARUS: a LIFE substudy.长期高血压患者的左心室质量、几何形状和功能与血管变化和/或胰岛素抵抗有关吗?ICARUS:LIFE子研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 2003 May;17(5):305-11. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001545.
5
Losartan but not atenolol reduce carotid artery hypertrophy in essential hypertension. A LIFE substudy.氯沙坦而非阿替洛尔可减轻原发性高血压患者的颈动脉肥厚。一项LIFE子研究。
Blood Press. 2005;14(3):177-83. doi: 10.1080/08037050510034185.
6
Relative influence of insulin resistance versus blood pressure on vascular changes in longstanding hypertension. ICARUS, a LIFE sub study. Insulin Carotids US Scandinavia.胰岛素抵抗与血压对长期高血压血管变化的相对影响。ICARUS,LIFE子研究。胰岛素、颈动脉、美国、斯堪的纳维亚。
J Hypertens. 2000 Jan;18(1):75-81. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200018010-00011.
7
Markers of collagen synthesis is related to blood pressure and vascular hypertrophy: a LIFE substudy.胶原蛋白合成标志物与血压及血管肥厚的关系:一项LIFE子研究
J Hum Hypertens. 2005 Apr;19(4):301-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001819.
8
Effects of losartan and atenolol on left ventricular mass and neurohormonal profile in patients with essential hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy.氯沙坦和阿替洛尔对原发性高血压伴左心室肥厚患者左心室质量和神经激素水平的影响。
J Hypertens. 2002 Sep;20(9):1855-64. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200209000-00032.
9
Losartan versus atenolol on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure. A LIFE substudy.
Blood Press. 2007;16(6):392-7. doi: 10.1080/08037050701642808.
10
In-treatment resolution or absence of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy is associated with decreased incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus in hypertensive patients: the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) Study.治疗期间心电图左心室肥厚的消退或不存在与高血压患者新发糖尿病发病率降低相关:氯沙坦干预降低高血压终点事件(LIFE)研究。
Hypertension. 2007 Nov;50(5):984-90. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.096818. Epub 2007 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Progression as Surrogate Marker for Cardiovascular Risk: Meta-Analysis of 119 Clinical Trials Involving 100 667 Patients.颈动脉内中膜厚度进展作为心血管风险的替代标志物:涉及 100667 名患者的 119 项临床试验的荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2020 Aug 18;142(7):621-642. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046361. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
2
Pancreatic stellate cells in the islets as a novel target to preserve the pancreatic β-cell mass and function.胰岛中的胰腺星状细胞作为一种新的靶点,用于保护胰岛β细胞的数量和功能。
J Diabetes Investig. 2020 Mar;11(2):268-280. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13202. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
3
Direct angiotensin II type 2 receptor stimulation ameliorates insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mice with PPARγ activation.
直接刺激血管紧张素 II 型 2 型受体可改善 PPARγ 激活的 2 型糖尿病小鼠的胰岛素抵抗。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048387. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
4
Effects of losartan on whole body, skeletal muscle and vascular insulin responses in obesity/insulin resistance without hypertension.氯沙坦对无高血压肥胖/胰岛素抵抗患者全身、骨骼肌和血管胰岛素反应的影响。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012 Mar;14(3):254-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01522.x. Epub 2011 Nov 24.
5
Fifteen years of losartan: what have we learned about losartan that can benefit chronic kidney disease patients?氯沙坦应用十五年:我们从氯沙坦中学到了哪些能使慢性肾脏病患者获益的知识?
Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2010;3:93-8. doi: 10.2147/ijnrd.s7038. Epub 2010 Jun 28.
6
Effects of antihypertensive treatments on incidence of diabetes: a case-control study.降压治疗对糖尿病发病率的影响:病例对照研究。
J Endocrinol Invest. 2012 Feb;35(2):135-8. doi: 10.3275/7750. Epub 2011 May 24.
7
Optimal use of beta-blockers in high-risk hypertension: a guide to dosing equivalence.β受体阻滞剂在高危高血压中的优化应用:剂量等效性指南
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010 Jun 1;6:363-72. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s6668.
8
Treating hypertension while protecting the vulnerable islet in the cardiometabolic syndrome.在治疗高血压的同时保护心脏代谢综合征中脆弱的胰岛。
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2008 Jul-Aug;2(4):239-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2007.12.002. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
9
Is pulse pressure a predictor of new-onset diabetes in high-risk hypertensive patients?: a subanalysis of the Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) trial.脉压能否预测高危高血压患者新发糖尿病?:坎地沙坦降压生存评估在日本(CASE-J)试验的亚分析。
Diabetes Care. 2010 May;33(5):1122-7. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1447. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
10
Beta-blocker use for the stages of heart failure.β受体阻滞剂在心力衰竭各阶段的应用。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2009 Aug;84(8):718-29. doi: 10.4065/84.8.718.