Nation Kate, Snowling Margaret J, Clarke Paula
University of Oxford.
J Child Lang. 2005 Feb;32(1):117-37. doi: 10.1017/s0305000904006555.
Three experiments investigated the ability of eight-year old children with poor language comprehension to produce past tense forms of verbs. Twenty children selected as poor comprehenders were compared to 20 age-matched control children. Although the poor comprehenders performed less well than controls on a range of tasks considered to tap verbal-semantic abilities, the two groups showed equivalent phonological skills. Poor comprehenders performed as well as control children when asked to inflect novel verbs and regular verbs. In contrast, poor comprehenders were less skilled than controls at inflecting both high frequency and low frequency irregular verbs. Although the predominant error pattern for all children was to over-regularize, this was most marked in the poor comprehenders; control children were more likely to produce errors that contained knowledge of the irregular form than poor comprehenders. In addition, the ability to inflect irregular verbs was related to individual differences in verbal-semantic skills. These findings are discussed within a framework in which verb inflection is related to underlying language skills in both the phonological and semantic domains.
三项实验研究了语言理解能力较差的8岁儿童生成动词过去式的能力。选取了20名被认定为理解能力差的儿童,并与20名年龄匹配的对照儿童进行比较。尽管在一系列被认为能考查言语语义能力的任务中,理解能力差的儿童表现不如对照组,但两组儿童的语音技能相当。当被要求对新动词和规则动词进行词形变化时,理解能力差的儿童表现与对照儿童一样好。相比之下,在对高频和低频不规则动词进行词形变化时,理解能力差的儿童比对照组儿童技能更差。尽管所有儿童最主要的错误模式是过度规则化,但这在理解能力差的儿童中最为明显;与理解能力差的儿童相比,对照儿童更有可能产生包含不规则形式知识的错误。此外,对不规则动词进行词形变化的能力与言语语义技能的个体差异有关。这些发现是在一个框架内进行讨论的,在这个框架中,动词词形变化与语音和语义领域的基础语言技能相关。