Suppr超能文献

词汇和语法的神经关联:来自失语症中词形变化产生、阅读及判断的证据。

Neural correlates of lexicon and grammar: evidence from the production, reading, and judgment of inflection in aphasia.

作者信息

Ullman Michael T, Pancheva Roumyana, Love Tracy, Yee Eiling, Swinney David, Hickok Gregory

机构信息

Brain and Language Lab, Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University, USA.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 2005 May;93(2):185-238; discussion 239-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.10.001.

Abstract

Are the linguistic forms that are memorized in the mental lexicon and those that are specified by the rules of grammar subserved by distinct neurocognitive systems or by a single computational system with relatively broad anatomic distribution? On a dual-system view, the productive -ed-suffixation of English regular past tense forms (e.g., look-looked) depends upon the mental grammar, whereas irregular forms (e.g., dig-dug) are retrieved from lexical memory. On a single-mechanism view, the computation of both past tense types depends on associative memory. Neurological double dissociations between regulars and irregulars strengthen the dual-system view. The computation of real and novel, regular and irregular past tense forms was investigated in 20 aphasic subjects. Aphasics with non-fluent agrammatic speech and left frontal lesions were consistently more impaired at the production, reading, and judgment of regular than irregular past tenses. Aphasics with fluent speech and word-finding difficulties, and with left temporal/temporo-parietal lesions, showed the opposite pattern. These patterns held even when measures of frequency, phonological complexity, articulatory difficulty, and other factors were held constant. The data support the view that the memorized words of the mental lexicon are subserved by a brain system involving left temporal/temporo-parietal structures, whereas aspects of the mental grammar, in particular the computation of regular morphological forms, are subserved by a distinct system involving left frontal structures.

摘要

存储在心理词典中的语言形式以及由语法规则规定的语言形式,是由不同的神经认知系统支撑,还是由一个具有相对广泛解剖分布的单一计算系统支撑?在双系统观点中,英语规则过去式形式(如look-looked)的生成性-ed后缀取决于心理语法,而不规则形式(如dig-dug)则从词汇记忆中检索。在单机制观点中,两种过去式类型的计算都依赖于联想记忆。规则形式和不规则形式之间的神经学双重分离强化了双系统观点。对20名失语症患者进行了真实和新颖的规则及不规则过去式形式的计算研究。患有非流利性语法缺失性言语且左额叶有病变的失语症患者,在规则过去式的生成、阅读和判断方面,始终比不规则过去式受损更严重。患有流利性言语和找词困难且左颞叶/颞顶叶有病变的失语症患者则表现出相反的模式。即使频率、语音复杂性、发音难度和其他因素的测量保持不变,这些模式依然成立。数据支持这样一种观点,即心理词典中存储的单词由一个涉及左颞叶/颞顶叶结构的脑系统支撑,而心理语法的各个方面,特别是规则形态形式的计算,由一个涉及左额叶结构的不同系统支撑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验