Coris Eric E, Miller Ernestine, Sahebzamani Frances
Department of Family Medicine, Division of Sports Medicine, University of South Florida College of Medicine, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Boulevard, MDC 13, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Clin J Sport Med. 2005 Mar;15(2):87-91. doi: 10.1097/01.jsm.0000152715.12721.fa.
To determine current outcomes of automated external defibrillator (AED) interventions in sports medicine programs in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) division I athletics.
Qualitative scripted telephone interview with all positive responders to prior NCAA division I-wide study on AED utilization and implementation.
NCAA division I sports medicine programs. Head athletic trainers were the main data source.
All positive responders to a previously published study on AED implementation in the NCAA division I sports medicine community. Positive responders were those that indicated that they had used their departmental AEDs in a sudden cardiac death (SCD) scenario.
Survival to hospital discharge was the main outcome sought. When available, additional outcomes were time to defibrillation, time to notification of athletic training staff, EMS response time, location of event, and sudden cardiac victim type (i.e., student, coach, fan).
Sixteen departments that previously reported having had an SCD event at their institution responded to this follow-up telephone survey. Twenty percent of AED uses were attributed to student athletes, with 33% of utilizations for athletic department staff and 47% for fans. Defibrillation was actually administered in 53% of AED unit applications. Time to shock was an average of 3.4 minutes, with average EMS response time of 8.2 minutes for those events without EMS on site. Reported survival to hospital discharge in this university athletic department setting for SCD was 0% for students, 75% for staff, 57% for fans, and 61% overall.
The results of this study demonstrate the need for NCAA division 1 athletic sports medicine programs to examine, and possibly expand, the traditional scope of practice of caring primarily for student athletes to include the larger community of sports participants comprised of athletes, departmental staff, and spectators. Athletic department AED programs were extremely successfully at increasing survival of SCD far above national prehospital standards, mainly in the nonathletic population. Further study is also necessary in the realm of AED placement, maintenance, and training of staff.
确定美国大学体育协会(NCAA)一级联盟体育赛事中自动体外除颤器(AED)干预措施的当前成效。
对先前NCAA一级联盟范围内关于AED使用与实施的研究中所有积极回应者进行定性书面电话访谈。
NCAA一级联盟运动医学项目。首席运动训练师为主要数据来源。
先前发表的关于NCAA一级联盟运动医学领域AED实施研究的所有积极回应者。积极回应者是指那些表示在心脏性猝死(SCD)场景中使用过其部门AED的人。
存活至出院是主要寻求的结局。如有可用数据,其他结局包括除颤时间、通知运动训练人员的时间、紧急医疗服务(EMS)响应时间、事件发生地点以及心脏性猝死受害者类型(即学生、教练、球迷)。
先前报告其所在机构发生过SCD事件的16个部门回应了此次后续电话调查。20%的AED使用归因于学生运动员,33%用于体育部门工作人员,47%用于球迷。在53%的AED设备应用中实际进行了除颤。电击平均时间为3.4分钟,对于那些现场没有EMS的事件,EMS平均响应时间为8.2分钟。在该大学体育部门环境中,报告的SCD学生存活至出院率为0%,工作人员为75%,球迷为57%,总体为61%。
本研究结果表明,NCAA一级联盟体育运动医学项目需要审视并可能扩大传统的主要照顾学生运动员的实践范围,以涵盖由运动员、部门工作人员和观众组成的更大的体育参与者群体。体育部门的AED项目在提高SCD存活率方面极其成功,远远高于国家院前标准,主要体现在非运动员人群中。在AED放置、维护和工作人员培训方面也需要进一步研究。