Häuser Winfried, Janke Karl-Heinz, Stallmach Andreas
Department of Internal Medicine I, Klinikum Saarbrücken, D-66119 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 May;48(5):952-62. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0888-1.
The aim of this study was to determine if ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis is a psychologic burden for patients, the frequency of mental disorders, the amount of psychologic distress, and their possible disease-related determinants. These factors were studied in patients with ulcerative colitis after ileal pouch anal anastomosis and were compared with ulcerative colitis patients without ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and the general German population.
A total of 37 patients with ulcerative colitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (age 46.8 +/- 11.8 years; 35 percent female) and 62 patients with ulcerative colitis without ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (age 44.4 +/- 13.9 years; 37 percent female) completed the following questionnaires: medical and sociodemographic questionnaire of the German Competence Network "Inflammatory Bowel Diseases" and the German version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Disease activity was measured in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis by the Pouch Disease Activity Index and in patients without ileal pouch-anal anastomosis by the German Inflammatory Bowel Disease Activity Index. Psychologic distress was assessed by the subscale scores of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. A probable mental disorder was identified if a patient scored 11 or higher in at least one subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
The frequency of a probable psychiatric disorder in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (16 percent) and without ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (23 percent) did not differ from that in the general German population (17 percent). Ulcerative colitis patients with or without ileal pouch-anal anastomosis did not differ in the amount of psychologic distress. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis patients had higher levels of anxiety than the general population (P < 0.01). Regression models of disease-related factors predicting mental disorder and psychologic distress showed no significant results.
Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis neither increases nor decreases the frequency of mental disorders or the amount of psychologic distress in ulcerative colitis patients.
本研究旨在确定溃疡性结肠炎患者行回肠贮袋肛管吻合术是否会给患者带来心理负担、精神障碍的发生率、心理困扰程度及其可能的疾病相关决定因素。对行回肠贮袋肛管吻合术的溃疡性结肠炎患者的这些因素进行研究,并与未行回肠贮袋肛管吻合术的溃疡性结肠炎患者及德国普通人群进行比较。
共有37例行回肠贮袋肛管吻合术的溃疡性结肠炎患者(年龄46.8±11.8岁;35%为女性)和62例未行回肠贮袋肛管吻合术的溃疡性结肠炎患者(年龄44.4±13.9岁;37%为女性)完成了以下问卷:德国“炎症性肠病”能力网络的医学和社会人口统计学问卷以及医院焦虑抑郁量表德文版。行回肠贮袋肛管吻合术的患者疾病活动度通过贮袋疾病活动指数测量,未行回肠贮袋肛管吻合术的患者通过德国炎症性肠病活动指数测量。心理困扰通过医院焦虑抑郁量表的子量表得分进行评估。如果患者在医院焦虑抑郁量表至少一个子量表中的得分达到11分或更高,则确定可能存在精神障碍。
行回肠贮袋肛管吻合术的患者(16%)和未行回肠贮袋肛管吻合术的患者(23%)中可能存在精神障碍的发生率与德国普通人群(17%)无差异。行或未行回肠贮袋肛管吻合术的溃疡性结肠炎患者在心理困扰程度上无差异。行回肠贮袋肛管吻合术的患者焦虑水平高于普通人群(P<0.01)。预测精神障碍和心理困扰的疾病相关因素回归模型未显示显著结果。
回肠贮袋肛管吻合术既不会增加也不会降低溃疡性结肠炎患者精神障碍的发生率或心理困扰程度。