Suppr超能文献

一种结直肠癌家族史强度的评分系统。

A scoring system for the strength of a family history of colorectal cancer.

作者信息

Church James M

机构信息

Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44143, USA.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 May;48(5):889-96. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0880-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Family history of colorectal cancer is associated with an increased risk for the disease, although there are many combinations of family history that are hard to correlate with risk status. A scoring system for family history of colorectal cancer was designed to make risk more readily quantifiable.

METHODS

A colonoscopy database was used to test the following points system: each first-degree relative with colorectal cancer = 3 points; each second-degree relative with colorectal cancer = 1 point. Families with one or more first-degree relative affected under 50 years of age = an extra 3 points. Families with one or more second-degree relative affected under 50 years of age = an extra 1 point. Families with multiple relatives on the same side of the family = an extra 3 points (first-degree relatives), 1 point (second-degree relatives), or 2 points (first-degree and second-degree relatives). Points were added and categories defined as follows: low risk, 1 to 4 points; medium risk, 5 to 7 points; high risk, 8 to 10 points; very high risk, >10 points. A control group of average-risk patients having screening colonoscopy was used. Categories were compared in number of adenomas, hyperplastic polyps, and cancers.

RESULTS

The records of 992 patients were used to test the system. Mean adenomas per patient per group were 0.4 for controls, 1.0 for low risk, 1.0 for medium risk, 1.7 for high risk, and 1.7 for very high risk. Cancers per group were 2 of 196 for controls, 8 of 513 for low risk, 3 of 171 for medium risk, 3 of 84 for high risk, and 1 of 28 for very high risk. The score categories were combined to produce revised risk levels of low (score 1 to 7) and high (>7). Average adenomas per patient in the revised categories were 0.4 (control), 1.0 (low risk), and 1.7 (high risk). The odds ratio of having one to two adenomas was 1.73 (1.19-2.50, 95% confidence limits) in the low-risk group and 2.39 (1.41-4.01) in the high-risk group. Odds ratios for having three or more adenomas were 5.70 (2.44-13.32) in the low-risk group and 10.35 (3.97-26.97) in the high-risk group.

CONCLUSION

In the two-category system proposed here of quantifying familial risk of colorectal cancer, patients having less than 8 points were at low risk and those with 8 or more were at high risk. Surveillance and chemoprevention protocols can be designed through use of these risk categories. A scoring system for family history of colorectal cancer can make risk assessment easier and facilitate both collaborative studies and patient triage into appropriate screening programs.

摘要

背景

结直肠癌家族史与该病风险增加相关,尽管存在多种家族史组合情况,难以与风险状态建立关联。设计了结直肠癌家族史评分系统,以便更易于对风险进行量化。

方法

利用结肠镜检查数据库来测试以下积分系统:每位患有结直肠癌的一级亲属计3分;每位患有结直肠癌的二级亲属计1分。有一名或多名50岁以下患癌一级亲属的家族额外计3分。有一名或多名50岁以下患癌二级亲属的家族额外计1分。家族中同一侧有多名亲属患癌的,额外计分如下:一级亲属额外计3分,二级亲属额外计1分,一级和二级亲属均有患癌的额外计2分。将分数相加,并按如下方式定义类别:低风险,1至4分;中度风险,5至7分;高风险,8至10分;极高风险,>10分。使用一组进行筛查性结肠镜检查的平均风险患者作为对照组。比较各组腺瘤、增生性息肉及癌症的数量。

结果

992例患者的记录用于测试该系统。每组患者的平均腺瘤数为:对照组0.4个,低风险组1.0个,中度风险组1.0个,高风险组1.7个,极高风险组1.7个。每组的癌症病例数为:对照组196例中有2例,低风险组513例中有8例,中度风险组171例中有3例,高风险组84例中有3例,极高风险组28例中有1例。将评分类别合并,得出修订后的低风险(评分1至7)和高风险(>7)水平。修订类别中每位患者的平均腺瘤数为:对照组0.4个,低风险组1.0个,高风险组1.7个。低风险组有1至2个腺瘤的比值比为1.73(1.19 - 2.50,95%置信区间),高风险组为2.39(1.41 - 4.01)。低风险组有3个或更多腺瘤的比值比为5.70(2.44 - 13.32),高风险组为10.35(3.97 - 26.97)。

结论

在此提出的用于量化结直肠癌家族风险的两类系统中,得分低于8分的患者为低风险,8分及以上的患者为高风险。可通过使用这些风险类别来设计监测和化学预防方案。结直肠癌家族史评分系统可使风险评估更简便,有助于开展协作研究,并便于将患者分诊至合适的筛查项目。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验