Suppr超能文献

荧光支气管镜检查在早期支气管内癌患者手术方式选择中的应用

Fluorescence bronchoscopy for selection of surgical procedure in patients with early staged endobronchial carcinoma.

作者信息

Tsunezuka Yoshio, Oda Makoto, Ohta Yasuhiko, Matsumoto Isao, Tamura Masaya, Watanabe Go

机构信息

Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Karatsuki-higashi 2-1, Kanazawa 920-8530, Japan.

出版信息

Artif Organs. 2005 Apr;29(4):348-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2005.29060.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is sometimes difficult to determine the extent of resection in patients with endobronchial carcinoma because preoperative white-light bronchoscopic (WLB) examination is not sensitive enough to examine the extent fully. Light-Induced Fluorescence Endoscopy (LIFE) is recognized as a useful modality for the diagnosis of early staged bronchial carcinoma, but there have been no reports of its significance in surgical treatment. We have studied the influence of LIFE upon the selection of surgical procedures or other treatments in patients with endobronchial carcinoma preoperatively.

METHODS

Conventional WLB and LIFE were performed within 7 days of operation. Biopsy specimens were taken from the marginal regions of the areas that were suspicious for malignancy on LIFE examination and WLB. We decided the resection line before operation and kept the resected central margin 1 cm apart from the area revealed as suspicious by LIFE.

RESULTS

From January 1999 to March 2003, 75 patients underwent LIFE. LIFE was performed to decide the surgical procedures for 12 patients (16.0%). Surgical therapy was performed in 8 (66.7%). LIFE findings dramatically changed the surgical procedures for 3 patients, lobectomy changed to sleeve lobectomy in 2 and laser therapy to segmentectomy in 1. LIFE revealed larger abnormal areas of bronchial cancer compared to WLB in 7 (58.3%). Conversely, WLB overestimated the extent of abnormal area in 1 (8.3%). WLB revealed the same cancer area as LIFE in 4. In all patients, the resected bronchial margins were cancer free intraoperatively and postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

LIFE can be more sensitive than WLB and be more beneficial for judging the extent of neoplastic bronchial changes for some patients. LIFE may be a useful modality for the preoperative selection of surgical procedures, especially whether sleeve resection is needed or not, for some centrally located superficial endobronchial carcinoma.

摘要

背景

对于支气管内癌患者,有时难以确定切除范围,因为术前白光支气管镜检查(WLB)的敏感度不足以全面检查病变范围。光诱导荧光内镜检查(LIFE)被认为是诊断早期支气管癌的一种有用方法,但尚无关于其在外科治疗中意义的报道。我们研究了LIFE对支气管内癌患者术前手术方式选择或其他治疗的影响。

方法

在手术7天内进行传统WLB和LIFE检查。从LIFE检查和WLB检查中可疑为恶性的区域边缘取活检标本。术前确定切除线,使切除的中心边缘与LIFE检查显示为可疑的区域相距1 cm。

结果

1999年1月至2003年3月,75例患者接受了LIFE检查。12例患者(16.0%)通过LIFE检查来确定手术方式。8例(66.7%)患者接受了手术治疗。LIFE检查结果使3例患者的手术方式发生了显著改变,2例患者从肺叶切除术改为袖状肺叶切除术,1例患者从激光治疗改为肺段切除术。与WLB相比,LIFE检查发现7例(58.3%)患者的支气管癌异常区域更大。相反,WLB高估了1例(8.3%)患者的异常区域范围。4例患者WLB检查显示的癌灶区域与LIFE检查相同。所有患者术中及术后切除的支气管边缘均无癌细胞。

结论

对于某些患者,LIFE检查可能比WLB检查更敏感,在判断肿瘤性支气管改变范围方面更具优势。对于一些位于中央的浅表支气管内癌患者,LIFE检查可能是术前选择手术方式,尤其是确定是否需要袖状切除的一种有用方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验