Suppr超能文献

对国家地图的记忆留存:对语义记忆组织的影响。

Preserved knowledge of maps of countries: implications for the organization of semantic memory.

作者信息

della Rocchetta Antonio Incisa, Cipolotti Lisa

机构信息

Department of Neuropsychology, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.

出版信息

Neurocase. 2004 Jun;10(3):249-64. doi: 10.1080/13554790490495186.

Abstract

We describe two patients with selectively preserved knowledge of the category of countries. Following a series of cerebral infarcts, patient DB presented with severe perceptual impairment, including dense apperceptive agnosia,prosopagnosia, and topographical agnosia. Despite these deficits, he could effortlessly name countries from their outline maps. Patient WH, who suffered from semantic dementia, had severe naming and comprehension difficulties, with extremely sparse residual semantic knowledge. Remarkably, the category of countries was preserved. First, we argue that, for both patients, this category preservation occurs at a semantic level. Second, we discuss our findings in the context of three current models of category-specific effects (perceptual, ontogenetic, and evolutionary models). We argue that the perceptual model (Humphreys and colleagues) cannot easily accommodate our findings. By contrast, the ontogenetic (Warrington and colleagues) and evolutionary models (Caramazza and colleagues) can explain our findings. However, some modifications to both models are required. The ontogenetic model needs to envisage a spatial channel for the development of map knowledge, which is anatomically separate from channels of other categories of knowledge. The evolutionary model needs to envisage the possibility that some categories of knowledge, such as countries, may not be prewired, but learned during ontogenetic development.

摘要

我们描述了两名对国家类别知识有选择性保留的患者。在经历一系列脑梗塞后,患者DB出现了严重的感知障碍,包括严重的统觉性失认症、面孔失认症和地形定向障碍。尽管存在这些缺陷,但他能毫不费力地根据轮廓地图说出国家名称。患者WH患有语义性痴呆,存在严重的命名和理解困难,剩余的语义知识极其稀少。值得注意的是,国家类别却得以保留。首先,我们认为,对于这两名患者而言,这种类别保留发生在语义层面。其次,我们在当前三种特定类别效应模型(感知模型、个体发生模型和进化模型)的背景下讨论我们的发现。我们认为感知模型(汉弗莱斯及其同事)难以轻易解释我们的发现。相比之下,个体发生模型(沃林顿及其同事)和进化模型(卡拉马扎及其同事)能够解释我们的发现。然而,这两种模型都需要进行一些修正。个体发生模型需要设想一个用于地图知识发展的空间通道,该通道在解剖学上与其他知识类别的通道相分离。进化模型需要设想这样一种可能性,即某些知识类别,如国家,可能并非预先设定,而是在个体发生发展过程中习得的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验