Ozmen A, Guthoff R, Winter R, Draeger J
Universitäts-Augenklinik Hamburg.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1992 Mar;200(3):171-4.
In three prospectively randomized groups of patients viscoelastic materials during IOL-implantation have been compared concerning 1. intraocular pressure, 2. endothelial cell count, 3. corneal thickness. Examinations were performed preoperatively, the first, second and fifth postoperative day. There was no statistical difference between hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (2%), hyaluronic acid (1%) and air. Examinations were performed preoperatively the first, the second and the fifth postoperative day. There was no statistically significant difference between all groups of patients, Advantages and disadvantages for routine use of viscoelastic substances are discussed.
在三组前瞻性随机分组的患者中,对人工晶状体植入术中使用的粘弹性材料在以下方面进行了比较:1. 眼压;2. 内皮细胞计数;3. 角膜厚度。术前、术后第一天、第二天和第五天进行了检查。羟丙基甲基纤维素(2%)、透明质酸(1%)和空气之间无统计学差异。术前、术后第一天、第二天和第五天进行了检查。所有患者组之间无统计学显著差异。讨论了粘弹性物质常规使用的优缺点。