Casadevall Nicole, Rossert Jerome
Department of Hematology, Hospital Hotel Dieu and INSERM U362, 1 Place Du Parvis Notre Dame, F75 181 Paris, France.
Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2005;18(3):381-7. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2005.01.014.
The importance of recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin) therapy has been clearly demonstrated in patients with anemia due to chronic kidney disease. The use of biopharmaceuticals to replace endogenous proteins, which may be inadequately low, carries the risk of stimulating the immune system to develop autoantibodies. Although these proteins are designed to closely mimic the endogenous proteins, they may have potential immunogenic properties. Erythropoietin produced by recombinant DNA technology is the most successful and efficacious agent for treating anemia. It was initially used in treating anemia in chronic kidney disease patients. Pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) ensuing from production of neutralizing anti-erythropoietin antibodies occurred very rarely with epoetin treatment. This agent was initially administered intravenously, but the mode of administration was progressively altered to subcutaneous without apparent increase in immune reaction. However, between 1998 and 2001, a sharp increase in the number of PRCA cases was seen. PRCA had been a very rare complication until this time. All of these patients had high affinity neutralizing anti-erythropoietin antibodies. This observation was made primarily in cases where one brand of epoetin, Eprex, was administered subcutaneously to patients with chronic kidney disease treated outside the United States, although a small number of cases among chronic kidney disease patients treated solely with epoetin beta were also identified. The marked increase in the number of Eprex cases was attributed to a change in the stabilizers, storage, and route of administration of Eprex to patients with chronic kidney disease. Since then changes have been made to the route of administration, storage, and handling of Eprex, and more recently to the rubber stoppers used in the prefilled syringes. Eprex was administered intravenously to chronic kidney disease patients and, with improved storage and handling, there was a subsequent dramatic reduction in the number of cases. More recently, the rubber stoppers have been replaced by Teflon-coated ones to prevent interactions with stabilizers and release of chemicals that have adjuvant properties. However, this concern is still relevant in the new generation of epoetin agents and generic formulations of epoetins. Epoetin treatment for anemia requires regular follow-up of hemoglobin levels but also of reticulocyte counts in chronic kidney disease patients.
重组人促红细胞生成素(促红素)疗法在慢性肾病所致贫血患者中的重要性已得到明确证实。使用生物制药来替代内源性蛋白质(其水平可能过低)存在刺激免疫系统产生自身抗体的风险。尽管这些蛋白质旨在紧密模拟内源性蛋白质,但它们可能具有潜在的免疫原性。通过重组DNA技术生产的促红细胞生成素是治疗贫血最成功且有效的药物。它最初用于治疗慢性肾病患者的贫血。促红素治疗极少引发因产生中和性抗促红细胞生成素抗体而导致的纯红细胞再生障碍性贫血(PRCA)。该药物最初通过静脉给药,但给药方式逐渐改为皮下注射,且免疫反应未见明显增加。然而,在1998年至2001年间,PRCA病例数量急剧增加。在此之前,PRCA一直是一种非常罕见的并发症。所有这些患者都有高亲和力的中和性抗促红细胞生成素抗体。这一现象主要出现在美国境外接受治疗的慢性肾病患者皮下注射一种名为益比奥(Eprex)的促红素品牌的病例中,不过在仅接受促红细胞生成素β治疗的慢性肾病患者中也发现了少数病例。益比奥病例数量的显著增加归因于其针对慢性肾病患者的稳定剂、储存和给药途径的改变。从那时起,益比奥的给药途径、储存和处理方式都发生了变化,最近还对预填充注射器中使用的橡胶塞进行了改进。益比奥改为对慢性肾病患者静脉给药,随着储存和处理的改善,病例数量随后大幅减少。最近,橡胶塞已被涂有特氟龙的塞子取代,以防止与稳定剂相互作用以及具有佐剂性质的化学物质释放。然而,在新一代促红细胞生成素药物和促红细胞生成素的仿制药中,这一问题仍然存在。对慢性肾病患者进行促红细胞生成素治疗贫血不仅需要定期监测血红蛋白水平,还需要监测网织红细胞计数。