Suppr超能文献

生物类似药疗法——我们需要考虑什么?

Biosimilar therapeutics-what do we need to consider?

作者信息

Schellekens Huub

机构信息

Departments of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Innovation Studies , Utrecht University , Utrecht , The Netherlands.

出版信息

NDT Plus. 2009 Jan;2(Suppl_1):i27-i36. doi: 10.1093/ndtplus/sfn177.

Abstract

Patents for the first generation of approved biopharmaceuticals have either expired or are about to expire. Thus the market is opening for generic versions, referred to as 'biosimilars' (European Union) or 'follow-on protein products' (United States). Healthcare professionals need to understand the critical issues surrounding the use of biosimilars to make informed treatment decisions.The complex high-molecular-weight three-dimensional structures of biopharmaceuticals, their heterogeneity and dependence on production in living cells makes them different from classical chemical drugs. Current analytical methods cannot characterize these complex molecules sufficiently to confirm structural equivalence with reference molecules. Verification of the similarity of biosimilars to innovator biopharmaceuticals remains a key challenge. Furthermore, a critical safety issue, the immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals, has been highlighted in recent years, confirming a need for comprehensive immunogenicity testing prior to approval and extended post-marketing surveillance.Biosimilars present a new set of challenges for regulatory authorities when compared with conventional generics. While the demonstration of a pharmacokinetic similarity is sufficient for conventional, small-molecule generic agents, a number of issues will make the approval of biosimilars more complicated. Documents recently published by the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) outlining requirements for the market approval of biosimilars provide much-needed guidance. The EMEA has approved a number of biosimilar products in a scientifically rigorous and balanced process. Outstanding issues include the interchangeability of biosimilars and innovator products, the possible need for unique naming to differentiate the various biopharmaceutical products, and more comprehensive labelling for biosimilars to include relevant clinical data.

摘要

第一代获批生物制药的专利要么已经过期,要么即将到期。因此,被称为“生物类似药”(欧盟)或“后续蛋白产品”(美国)的仿制药市场正在开放。医疗保健专业人员需要了解围绕生物类似药使用的关键问题,以便做出明智的治疗决策。生物制药复杂的高分子量三维结构、其异质性以及对活细胞生产的依赖性使其有别于传统化学药物。当前的分析方法无法充分表征这些复杂分子,以确认与参比分子的结构等效性。验证生物类似药与创新生物制药的相似性仍然是一项关键挑战。此外,一个关键的安全问题,即生物制药的免疫原性,近年来已受到关注,这证实了在批准前需要进行全面的免疫原性测试以及在上市后进行长期监测的必要性。与传统仿制药相比,生物类似药给监管机构带来了一系列新挑战。虽然药代动力学相似性的证明对于传统小分子仿制药来说就足够了,但一些问题将使生物类似药的批准更加复杂。欧洲药品管理局(EMEA)最近发布的概述生物类似药市场批准要求的文件提供了急需的指导。EMEA已在科学严谨且平衡的过程中批准了一些生物类似药产品。悬而未决的问题包括生物类似药与创新产品的可互换性、可能需要独特的命名以区分各种生物制药产品,以及为生物类似药提供更全面的标签以纳入相关临床数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6699/2638545/e4dfef4bb169/sfn177fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Biosimilar therapeutics-what do we need to consider?
NDT Plus. 2009 Jan;2(Suppl_1):i27-i36. doi: 10.1093/ndtplus/sfn177.
2
Development and regulation of biosimilars: current status and future challenges.
BioDrugs. 2013 Jun;27(3):203-11. doi: 10.1007/s40259-013-0020-y.
3
Biosimilars: policy, clinical, and regulatory considerations.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Jul 15;65(14 Suppl 6):S2-8. doi: 10.2146/ajhp080210.
4
Biosimilars: impact of biologic product life cycle and European experience on the regulatory trajectory in the United States.
Clin Ther. 2012 Feb;34(2):400-19. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
5
Follow-on biologics: challenges of the "next generation".
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005 May;20 Suppl 4:iv31-36. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh1085.
6
Biopharmaceuticals for rheumatic diseases in Latin America, Europe, Russia, and India: innovators, biosimilars, and intended copies.
Joint Bone Spine. 2014 Dec;81(6):471-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2014.03.019. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
7
Statistical assessment of biosimilar products.
J Biopharm Stat. 2010 Jan;20(1):10-30. doi: 10.1080/10543400903280266.
8
Biosimilar medical products - licensing, pharmacovigilance and interchangeability.
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2016;37(1):27-36. doi: 10.1515/prilozi-2016-0006.
9
Biosimilars: potential implications for clinicians.
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Jun 17;9:135-42. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S91691. eCollection 2016.
10
A Comprehensive Overview on Biosimilars.
Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2016;17(8):756-761. doi: 10.2174/1389203717666160226144618.

引用本文的文献

1
Brand-to-brand nonmedical switching among interleukin-17 inhibitors or other biologics: Implications of a formulary change.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 Jun;31(6):544-551. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.24317. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
2
The potential for biosimilars to address unmet clinical need - Is the developed world missing out?
Rheumatol Immunol Res. 2025 Jan 9;5(4):186-188. doi: 10.1515/rir-2024-0027. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Biosimilar and Follow-on Insulin: The Ins, Outs, and Interchangeability.
J Pharm Technol. 2019 Feb;35(1):25-35. doi: 10.1177/8755122518802268. Epub 2018 Sep 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Pure red cell aplasia due to follow-on epoetin.
Kidney Int. 2008 Dec;74(12):1617-22. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.230. Epub 2008 Jun 11.
2
Pure red cell aplasia induced by erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Jan;3(1):193-9. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02440607.
3
The first biosimilar epoetin: but how similar is it?
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Jan;3(1):174-8. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04251007. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
4
The challenge of biosimilars.
Ann Oncol. 2008 Mar;19(3):411-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm345. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
5
EORTC guidelines for the use of erythropoietic proteins in anaemic patients with cancer: 2006 update.
Eur J Cancer. 2007 Jan;43(2):258-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.10.014. Epub 2006 Dec 19.
6
Immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Oct;21 Suppl 5:v9-12. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl476.
7
European regulatory guidelines for biosimilars.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Oct;21 Suppl 5:v17-20. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl477.
8
Comparative testing and pharmacovigilance of biosimilars.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Oct;21 Suppl 5:v13-6. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl475.
9
Biosimilars: how similar or dissimilar are they?
Nephrology (Carlton). 2006 Aug;11(4):341-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2006.00594.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验