Delmore J, Horbelt D V, Kallail K J
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita.
Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jun;79(6):1016-9.
During a 2-year period, 293 consecutive conizations performed by residents in obstetrics and gynecology were reviewed. One hundred sixty-one patients underwent laser excision and 132 women were treated by cold knife conization. Average operating times for laser excision and knife conization were 31 and 33 minutes, respectively. Combined minor and major complication rates for laser and knife cones were 19 and 30%, respectively. Major complications including cervical stenosis and heavy bleeding were seen in 20% of knife conizations and 6% of laser excisions. Average blood loss for knife conization was 65 mL, and average blood loss for laser conization was 34 mL. Among those examined in follow-up with cervical cytology and colposcopy, no patient in the laser excision group showed evidence of persistent dysplasia, compared with one patient (3%) in the knife conization group. The reported data suggest no difference in operating time, length of anesthesia, or success of treatment between laser excision and knife conization performed by residents in training. Fewer complications were seen in the laser excision group.
在两年期间,对妇产科住院医师连续进行的293例宫颈锥切术进行了回顾。161例患者接受了激光切除术,132例女性接受了冷刀锥切术。激光切除术和冷刀锥切术的平均手术时间分别为31分钟和33分钟。激光锥切术和冷刀锥切术的轻度和重度并发症合并发生率分别为19%和30%。20%的冷刀锥切术和6%的激光切除术出现了包括宫颈狭窄和大出血在内的严重并发症。冷刀锥切术的平均失血量为65毫升,激光锥切术的平均失血量为34毫升。在接受宫颈细胞学检查和阴道镜检查随访的患者中,激光切除组没有患者出现持续性发育异常的迹象,而冷刀锥切术组有1例患者(3%)出现这种情况。报告的数据表明,培训中的住院医师进行激光切除术和冷刀锥切术在手术时间、麻醉时长或治疗成功率方面没有差异。激光切除组的并发症较少。