Selçuk İlker, Ersak Burak, Umaroğlu Mutlu, Özel Şule, Yalçın Hakan, Üstün Yusuf, Engin-Üstün Yaprak
University of Health Sciences Turkey, Zekai Tahir Burak Woman's Health Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
University of Health Sciences Turkey, Zekai Tahir Burak Woman's Health Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Gynecology, Ankara, Turkey.
Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;17(2):133-138. doi: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2020.25675. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and cold-knife conization (CKC) active training model on the surgical education and confidence levels of gynecologists.
The LEEP and CKC hands-on training model consists of sausage, which is 2.5 cm in diameter, as cervix; plastic cup as vagina; foam rubber as posterior and anterior fornices; and cotton plate as the leukoplakia area. In total, 34 participants performed LEEP and CKC procedures on the training model under the guidance of mentors after theoretical lessons about the transformation zone, indications, and surgical techniques of LEEP and CKC. Afterward, a web-based survey was conducted to measure the effectiveness of this surgical model, and participants graded their learning and confidence levels on the same.
We evaluated the educational levels of the course, which were based on the basic surgical steps of LEEP and CKC procedures, and the confidence levels of the participants with regard to the previous practice or expertise of LEEP and CKC. Importantly, participants in each group had similar learning gains irrespective of previous practice or expertise. Despite a significantly higher pre-course confidence level of participants who had previously performed LEEP (p<0.001) and CKC (p<0.001) against their non-practitioner counterparts, the post-course confidence levels were similar in each group (p=0.127 and p=0.845, respectively). In both groups, the participants had increased mean confidence scores, which were statistically significant for participants who had not previously performed the procedures (p=0.003, LEEP and p=0.002, CKC, respectively).
This surgical training model on LEEP and CKC can impart a better level of education in participants, irrespective of their previous expertise/practice.
本研究旨在评估环形电切术(LEEP)和冷刀锥切术(CKC)实操培训模型对妇科医生手术教育及信心水平的影响。
LEEP和CKC实操培训模型由直径2.5厘米的香肠模拟宫颈;塑料杯模拟阴道;泡沫橡胶模拟前后穹窿;棉板模拟白斑区域。共有34名参与者在接受关于LEEP和CKC的转化区、适应证及手术技术的理论课程后,在导师指导下对培训模型进行LEEP和CKC操作。之后,开展了一项基于网络的调查以评估该手术模型的有效性,参与者对自身的学习及信心水平进行评分。
我们评估了基于LEEP和CKC手术基本步骤的课程教育水平,以及参与者对LEEP和CKC既往实践或专业知识的信心水平。重要的是,无论既往实践或专业知识如何,每组参与者的学习收获相似。尽管此前进行过LEEP(p<0.001)和CKC(p<0.001)的参与者术前信心水平显著高于未从业者,但术后每组的信心水平相似(分别为p=0.127和p=0.845)。两组参与者的平均信心得分均有所提高,对于此前未进行过这些操作的参与者,提高具有统计学意义(LEEP为p=0.003,CKC为p=0.002)。
这种LEEP和CKC手术培训模型能够为参与者提供更好的教育水平,无论其既往专业知识/实践情况如何。