Eren M Nesimi, Balci Akin E, Eren Sevval
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Dicle and Firat University School of Medicine, Elaziğ 23100, Turkey.
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2005 Mar;13(1):20-3. doi: 10.1177/021849230501300105.
Capitonnage is usually advocated for obliteration of the residual cavity after removal of a hydatid cyst. To assess a non-capitonnage method, results in 33 patients were compared with those of 80 patients who had capitonnage. The non-capitonnage patients had a shorter mean hospital stay and earlier radiologic improvement but higher morbidity than the capitonnage patients. Extended air leak caused significant morbidity in each group. Bronchoscopic intervention was needed for atelectasis in 1 patient. There was no mortality in either group. In the follow-up period, no late complication or recurrence was observed in non-capitonnage patients. Among the capitonnage patients, 2 had bronchiectasis, and suture material expectoration occurred in one. The non-capitonnage method may be a good alternative to the capitonnage procedure for lung hydatid cyst. Better management of bronchial openings should improve the results of the non-capitonnage method.
通常主张采用内翻缝合术来消除包虫囊肿切除术后的残腔。为评估一种非内翻缝合术方法,将33例患者的结果与80例行内翻缝合术患者的结果进行了比较。非内翻缝合术患者的平均住院时间较短,影像学改善较早,但发病率高于内翻缝合术患者。持续性漏气在每组中均导致了显著的发病率。1例患者因肺不张需要支气管镜干预。两组均无死亡病例。在随访期间,非内翻缝合术患者未观察到晚期并发症或复发。在内翻缝合术患者中,2例发生支气管扩张,1例咳出缝线材料。对于肺包虫囊肿,非内翻缝合术方法可能是内翻缝合术的一个良好替代方案。更好地处理支气管开口应能改善非内翻缝合术方法的效果。