Suppr超能文献

高危头颈癌患者术后放化疗:证据有多充分?

Chemoradiation after surgery for high-risk head and neck cancer patients: how strong is the evidence?

作者信息

Bernier Jacques, Cooper Jay S

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, San Giovanni Hospital, CH-6504 Bellinzona, Switzerland.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2005 Mar;10(3):215-24. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.10-3-215.

Abstract

Patients with locally advanced, operable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are known to be at high risk of treatment failure, ranging from local regrowth to lymphatic spread to systemic dissemination. Attacking specifically each of these patterns of failure implies the use of a multimodal approach. Throughout the past two decades the management of stages III/IV HNSCC remained a matter of debate, especially with regards to treatment intensity and sequencing. Surgery and/or radiotherapy were the mainstay of local-regional treatment in patients with locally advanced disease, but treatment outcome often remained disappointing. In the hope of improving the prognosis after radical surgery, cisplatin-based combinations have been administered before surgery, in the interval between surgery and radiotherapy, or after radiotherapy. Until very recently these combinations, at best, decreased systemic failures without having a real impact on local outcome or survival. Indeed, until the mid-1990s, most trials that had tested postoperative combinations of chemotherapy and radiotherapy did not show any significant benefit. In 2004 level I evidence was established with the publication of the results of two large-scale, independent but similar trials conducted in Europe and the U.S. Both studies demonstrated that, compared with postoperative irradiation alone, adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation was more efficacious in terms of local-regional control and disease-free survival. With the publication of these two trials the evidence demonstrating the potential value of concurrent postoperative chemoradiotherapy in high-risk operable head and neck cancer is strong; however, additional studies and comparative analysis of the selection criteria and treatment outcomes across these two trials will be needed to gain a more accurate assessment of benefit and risk levels in specific patients with operable, locally advanced disease.

摘要

局部晚期、可手术切除的头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者已知处于治疗失败的高风险中,范围从局部复发到淋巴转移再到全身播散。针对这些特定的失败模式进行治疗意味着采用多模式方法。在过去的二十年中,III/IV期HNSCC的治疗一直存在争议,特别是在治疗强度和治疗顺序方面。手术和/或放疗是局部晚期疾病患者局部区域治疗的主要手段,但治疗结果往往仍然令人失望。为了改善根治性手术后的预后,基于顺铂的联合治疗已在手术前、手术与放疗之间的间隔期或放疗后使用。直到最近,这些联合治疗充其量只是减少了全身失败,而对局部结果或生存率没有真正影响。事实上,直到20世纪90年代中期,大多数测试化疗与放疗术后联合治疗的试验都没有显示出任何显著益处。2004年,随着在欧洲和美国进行的两项大规模、独立但相似试验结果的发表,确立了I级证据。两项研究均表明,与单纯术后放疗相比,辅助性同步放化疗在局部区域控制和无病生存率方面更有效。随着这两项试验的发表,证明同步术后放化疗在高危可手术切除的头颈部癌中的潜在价值的证据很充分;然而,需要对这两项试验的选择标准和治疗结果进行更多的研究和比较分析,以便更准确地评估特定可手术切除的局部晚期疾病患者的获益和风险水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验