Figueiredo Eberval Gadelha, Deshmukh Pushpa, Zabramski Joseph M, Preul Mark C, Crawford Neil R, Siwanuwatn Rungsak, Spetzler Robert F
Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona 85013, USA.
Neurosurgery. 2005 Apr;56(2 Suppl):397-405; discussion 397-405. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000156549.96185.6d.
To compare the angles of approach and area of exposure to the anterior communicating artery (AComA) complex associated with pterional (PT), orbitopterional (OPT), and orbitozygomatic (OZ) craniotomies before and after gyrus rectus resection.
PT, OPT, and OZ craniotomies were performed on both sides of four heads, and the angles of approach and area of exposure to the AComA complex were measured before and after resection of the gyrus rectus.
The vertical angle of approach increased significantly among the PT and OPT (P = 0.001), PT and OZ (P = 0.001), and OPT and OZ approaches (P = 0.005). The horizontal angle of approach was significantly larger between the PT to OPT (P = 0.001) and PT to OZ (P = 0.001) approaches but not between the OPT and OZ approaches (P = 0.757). After gyrus rectus resection, the vertical and horizontal angles of approach increased significantly for the PT approach but not for the OPT and OZ approaches. The area of exposure to the AComA complex increased progressively from the PT to OPT to OZ approach but did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.124). Resection of the gyrus rectus resulted in significant relative gains in the area of exposure for the PT (P = 0.01) and OPT (P = 0.04) approaches but not for the OZ approach (P = 0.88).
The vertical and horizontal angles of approach to the AComA complex are significantly larger for the OPT and OZ approaches compared with the PT approach. Use of the OZ approach may decrease the need for frontal lobe retraction and resection of the gyrus rectus.
比较在切除直回前后,翼点(PT)、眶翼点(OPT)和眶颧(OZ)开颅术与前交通动脉(AComA)复合体相关的入路角度和暴露区域。
在四个头颅的两侧进行PT、OPT和OZ开颅术,并在切除直回前后测量AComA复合体的入路角度和暴露区域。
PT与OPT(P = 0.001)、PT与OZ(P = 0.001)以及OPT与OZ入路之间的垂直入路角度显著增加(P = 0.005)。PT至OPT(P = 0.001)和PT至OZ(P = 0.001)入路之间的水平入路角度显著更大,但OPT与OZ入路之间则不然(P = 0.757)。切除直回后,PT入路的垂直和水平入路角度显著增加,而OPT和OZ入路则没有。从PT至OPT至OZ入路,AComA复合体的暴露区域逐渐增加,但未达到统计学意义(P = 0.124)。切除直回导致PT(P = 0.01)和OPT(P = 0.04)入路的暴露区域有显著的相对增加,但OZ入路没有(P = 0.88)。
与PT入路相比,OPT和OZ入路至AComA复合体的垂直和水平入路角度显著更大。使用OZ入路可能会减少额叶牵拉和直回切除的需求。