Kaplan Lee M, Fallon John A, Mun Edward C, Harvey Alan M, Kastrinakis William V, Johnson Elvira Q, Nierman Robert S, Keroack Christopher R
Massachusetts General Hospital Weight Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford Street, Fourth Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Obes Res. 2005 Feb;13(2):290-300. doi: 10.1038/oby.2005.39.
To review the use and usefulness of billing codes for services related to weight loss surgery (WLS) and to examine third party reimbursement policies for these services.
The Task Group carried out a systematic search of MEDLINE, the Internet, and the trade press for publications on WLS, coding, reimbursement, and coding and reimbursement policy. Twenty-eight articles were each reviewed and graded using a system based on established evidence-based models. The Massachusetts Dietetics Association provided reimbursement data for nutrition services. Three suppliers of laparoscopic WLS equipment provided summaries of coding and reimbursement information. WLS program directors were surveyed for information on use of procedure codes related to WLS.
Recommendations focused on correcting or improving on the current lack of congruity among coding practices, reimbursement policies, and accepted clinical practice; lack of uniform coding and reimbursement data across institutions; inconsistent and/or inaccurate diagnostic and billing codes; inconsistent insurance reimbursement criteria; and inability to leverage reimbursement and coding data to track outcomes, identify best practices, and perform accurate risk-benefit analyses.
Rapid changes in the prevalence of obesity, our understanding of its clinical impact, and the technologies for surgical treatment have yet to be adequately reflected in coding, coverage, and reimbursement policies. Issues identified as key to effective change include improved characterization of the risks, benefits, and costs of WLS; anticipation and monitoring of technological advances; encouragement of consistent patterns of insurance coverage; and promotion of billing codes for WLS procedures that facilitate accurate tracking of clinical use and outcomes.
回顾减肥手术(WLS)相关服务计费代码的使用情况及效用,并审视这些服务的第三方报销政策。
任务组对MEDLINE、互联网及行业媒体进行了系统检索,以查找有关WLS、编码、报销以及编码与报销政策的出版物。使用基于既定循证模型的系统对28篇文章进行了逐一评审和分级。马萨诸塞州营养协会提供了营养服务的报销数据。三家腹腔镜WLS设备供应商提供了编码和报销信息摘要。对WLS项目主任进行了调查,以获取有关WLS相关手术代码使用情况的信息。
建议聚焦于纠正或改善当前编码实践、报销政策与公认临床实践之间缺乏一致性的问题;各机构间缺乏统一的编码和报销数据;诊断和计费代码不一致和/或不准确;保险报销标准不一致;以及无法利用报销和编码数据来跟踪结果、确定最佳实践并进行准确的风险效益分析。
肥胖患病率、我们对其临床影响的理解以及手术治疗技术的快速变化,在编码、覆盖范围和报销政策中尚未得到充分体现。被确定为有效变革关键的问题包括改善对WLS风险、益处和成本的描述;预测和监测技术进步;鼓励一致的保险覆盖模式;以及推广有助于准确跟踪临床使用情况和结果的WLS手术计费代码。