Scientific research is a moral duty.
作者信息
Harris John
出版信息
J Med Ethics. 2005 Apr;31(4):242-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.011973.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Scientific research is a moral duty.
J Med Ethics. 2005 Apr;31(4):242-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.011973.
2
A duty to participate in research: does social context matter?
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Oct;8(10):28-36. doi: 10.1080/15265160802393017.
3
Dual use and the ethical responsibility of scientists.
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2008 May-Jun;56(3):147-52. doi: 10.1007/s00005-008-0020-7. Epub 2008 May 30.
4
Participation in biomedical research is an imperfect moral duty: a response to John Harris.
J Med Ethics. 2007 Jul;33(7):414-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.017384.
5
Scientific uncertainty and medical responsibility.
Theor Med. 1987 Jun;8(2):221-34. doi: 10.1007/BF00539757.
6
Response to open peer commentaries on "A duty to participate in research: does social context matter?".
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Oct;8(10):W3-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160802519462.
7
Values, obligations, and virtues: approaches to bio-medical ethics.
J Relig Ethics. 1976 Spring;4(1):105-30.
8
An ethics of suffering: does it solve the problems we want to solve?: commentary.
J Clin Ethics. 1991 Summer;2(2):107.
9
Animals, science, and ethics -- Section I. Ethical theory and the moral status of animals.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1990 May-Jun;20(3):S4-7.
10
Hypothesis formulation--another "inviolate" realm open for ethical inquiry?
Clin Res. 1976 Feb;24(2):53-5.
引用本文的文献
1
Balancing ethical norms and duties for the introduction of new medicines through conditional marketing authorization: a research agenda.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jun 24;11:1408553. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1408553. eCollection 2024.
2
Data-driven research and healthcare: public trust, data governance and the NHS.
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Jul 14;24(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00922-z.
3
Using Patient Perspectives to Inform Better Clinical Trial Design and Conduct: Current Trends and Future Directions.
Pharmaceut Med. 2023 Mar;37(2):129-138. doi: 10.1007/s40290-022-00458-4. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
4
Is there a civic duty to support medical AI development by sharing electronic health records?
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Dec 10;23(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00871-z.
5
Do Clinicians Have a Duty to Participate in Pragmatic Clinical Trials?
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Aug;23(8):22-32. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2146784. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
6
Beyond trust: Amplifying unheard voices on concerns about harm resulting from health data-sharing.
Med Access Point Care. 2021 Oct 1;5:23992026211048421. doi: 10.1177/23992026211048421. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
7
Motivations and barriers for healthy participants to participate in herbal remedy clinical trial in Tanzania: A qualitative study based on the theory of planned behaviour.
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 21;17(7):e0271828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271828. eCollection 2022.
8
Two kinds of embryo research: four case examples.
J Med Ethics. 2022 Sep;48(9):590-596. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-108038. Epub 2022 May 9.
9
Evaluating models of consent in changing health research environments.
Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Jun;25(2):269-280. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10074-3. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
10
Do people have an ethical obligation to share their health information? Comparing narratives of altruism and health information sharing in a nationally representative sample.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244767. eCollection 2020.
本文引用的文献
1
Ethical genetic research on human subjects.
Jurimetrics. 1999 Fall;40:77-91.
2
Law and regulation of retained organs: the ethical issues.
Leg Stud (Soc Leg Scholars). 2002 Nov;22(4):527-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-121x.2002.tb00667.x.
3
Should patients be allowed to veto their participation in clinical research?
J Med Ethics. 2004 Apr;30(2):198-203. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.002444.
4
Should we presume moral turpitude in our children?--small children and consent to medical research.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2003;24(2):121-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1024651013837.
5
Organ procurement: dead interests, living needs.
J Med Ethics. 2003 Jun;29(3):130-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.29.3.130.
6
Extending human lifespan and the precautionary paradox.
J Med Philos. 2002 Jun;27(3):355-68. doi: 10.1076/jmep.27.3.355.2983.
7
The concept of the person and the value of life.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1999 Dec;9(4):293-308. doi: 10.1353/ken.1999.0026.
8
Paying people to participate in research: why not? A response to Wilkinson and Moore.
Bioethics. 1997 Oct;11(5):390-6. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00079.
9
Risk-taking and professional responsibility.
J R Soc Med. 1997 Nov;90(11):625-9. doi: 10.1177/014107689709001109.
10
The ethics of clinical research in the Third World.
N Engl J Med. 1997 Sep 18;337(12):847-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199709183371209.
Zotero 插件