Suppr超能文献

人们有分享自身健康信息的道德义务吗?在一个具有全国代表性的样本中比较利他主义与健康信息分享的叙述。

Do people have an ethical obligation to share their health information? Comparing narratives of altruism and health information sharing in a nationally representative sample.

作者信息

Raj Minakshi, De Vries Raymond, Nong Paige, Kardia Sharon L R, Platt Jodyn E

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Champaign, IL, United States of America.

Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244767. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the emergence of new health information technologies, health information can be shared across networks, with or without patients' awareness and/or their consent. It is often argued that there can be an ethical obligation to participate in biomedical research, motivated by altruism, particularly when risks are low. In this study, we explore whether altruism contributes to the belief that there is an ethical obligation to share information about one's health as well as how other health care experiences, perceptions, and concerns might be related to belief in such an obligation.

METHODS

We conducted an online survey using the National Opinion Research Center's (NORC) probability-based, nationally representative sample of U.S. adults. Our final analytic sample included complete responses from 2069 participants. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine how altruism, together with other knowledge, attitudes, and experiences contribute to the belief in an ethical obligation to allow health information to be used for research.

RESULTS

We find in multivariable regression that general altruism is associated with a higher likelihood of belief in an ethical obligation to allow one's health information to be used for research (OR = 1.22, SE = 0.14, p = 0.078). Trust in the health system and in care providers are both associated with a significantly higher likelihood of believing there is an ethical obligation to allow health information to be used (OR = 1.48, SE = 0.76, p<0.001; OR = 1.58, SE = 0.26, p<0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Belief that there is an ethical obligation to allow one's health information to be used for research is shaped by altruism and by one's experience with, and perceptions of, health care and by general concerns about the use of personal information. Altruism cannot be assumed and researchers must recognize the ways encounters with the health care system influence (un)willingness to share one's health information.

摘要

背景

随着新的健康信息技术的出现,健康信息能够在网络上共享,无论患者是否知晓和/或同意。人们常认为,出于利他主义,参与生物医学研究可能存在道德义务,尤其是在风险较低时。在本研究中,我们探讨利他主义是否促成了人们认为有道德义务分享个人健康信息的信念,以及其他医疗保健经历、认知和担忧可能如何与对这种义务的信念相关。

方法

我们使用美国国家民意研究中心(NORC)基于概率的、具有全国代表性的美国成年人样本进行了一项在线调查。我们的最终分析样本包括2069名参与者的完整回复。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来研究利他主义以及其他知识、态度和经历如何促成人们认为有道德义务允许健康信息用于研究的信念。

结果

我们在多变量回归中发现,一般利他主义与认为有道德义务允许个人健康信息用于研究的可能性更高相关(比值比 = 1.22,标准误 = 0.14,p = 0.078)。对医疗系统和医护人员的信任均与认为有道德义务允许使用健康信息的可能性显著更高相关(分别为比值比 = 1.48,标准误 = 0.76,p<0.001;比值比 = 1.58,标准误 = 0.26,p<0.01)。

结论

认为有道德义务允许个人健康信息用于研究的信念受到利他主义、个人的医疗保健经历和认知以及对个人信息使用的普遍担忧的影响。不能假定存在利他主义,研究人员必须认识到与医疗系统的接触影响(不)愿意分享个人健康信息的方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验