Suppr超能文献

人们有分享自身健康信息的道德义务吗?在一个具有全国代表性的样本中比较利他主义与健康信息分享的叙述。

Do people have an ethical obligation to share their health information? Comparing narratives of altruism and health information sharing in a nationally representative sample.

作者信息

Raj Minakshi, De Vries Raymond, Nong Paige, Kardia Sharon L R, Platt Jodyn E

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Champaign, IL, United States of America.

Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244767. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the emergence of new health information technologies, health information can be shared across networks, with or without patients' awareness and/or their consent. It is often argued that there can be an ethical obligation to participate in biomedical research, motivated by altruism, particularly when risks are low. In this study, we explore whether altruism contributes to the belief that there is an ethical obligation to share information about one's health as well as how other health care experiences, perceptions, and concerns might be related to belief in such an obligation.

METHODS

We conducted an online survey using the National Opinion Research Center's (NORC) probability-based, nationally representative sample of U.S. adults. Our final analytic sample included complete responses from 2069 participants. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine how altruism, together with other knowledge, attitudes, and experiences contribute to the belief in an ethical obligation to allow health information to be used for research.

RESULTS

We find in multivariable regression that general altruism is associated with a higher likelihood of belief in an ethical obligation to allow one's health information to be used for research (OR = 1.22, SE = 0.14, p = 0.078). Trust in the health system and in care providers are both associated with a significantly higher likelihood of believing there is an ethical obligation to allow health information to be used (OR = 1.48, SE = 0.76, p<0.001; OR = 1.58, SE = 0.26, p<0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Belief that there is an ethical obligation to allow one's health information to be used for research is shaped by altruism and by one's experience with, and perceptions of, health care and by general concerns about the use of personal information. Altruism cannot be assumed and researchers must recognize the ways encounters with the health care system influence (un)willingness to share one's health information.

摘要

背景

随着新的健康信息技术的出现,健康信息能够在网络上共享,无论患者是否知晓和/或同意。人们常认为,出于利他主义,参与生物医学研究可能存在道德义务,尤其是在风险较低时。在本研究中,我们探讨利他主义是否促成了人们认为有道德义务分享个人健康信息的信念,以及其他医疗保健经历、认知和担忧可能如何与对这种义务的信念相关。

方法

我们使用美国国家民意研究中心(NORC)基于概率的、具有全国代表性的美国成年人样本进行了一项在线调查。我们的最终分析样本包括2069名参与者的完整回复。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来研究利他主义以及其他知识、态度和经历如何促成人们认为有道德义务允许健康信息用于研究的信念。

结果

我们在多变量回归中发现,一般利他主义与认为有道德义务允许个人健康信息用于研究的可能性更高相关(比值比 = 1.22,标准误 = 0.14,p = 0.078)。对医疗系统和医护人员的信任均与认为有道德义务允许使用健康信息的可能性显著更高相关(分别为比值比 = 1.48,标准误 = 0.76,p<0.001;比值比 = 1.58,标准误 = 0.26,p<0.01)。

结论

认为有道德义务允许个人健康信息用于研究的信念受到利他主义、个人的医疗保健经历和认知以及对个人信息使用的普遍担忧的影响。不能假定存在利他主义,研究人员必须认识到与医疗系统的接触影响(不)愿意分享个人健康信息的方式。

相似文献

9
Health research participants' preferences for receiving research results.健康研究参与者对接收研究结果的偏好。
Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):582-591. doi: 10.1177/1740774516665598. Epub 2016 Aug 24.

本文引用的文献

7
The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks reconsidered.《永生的海拉细胞》再审视
Hastings Cent Rep. 2014 Jan-Feb;44(1):1p following 48. doi: 10.1002/hast.239.
10
Genetic research among the Havasupai--a cautionary tale.哈瓦苏派部落的基因研究——一个警示故事。
Virtual Mentor. 2011 Feb 1;13(2):113-7. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2011.13.2.hlaw1-1102.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验