Maudsley Stuart, Martin Bronwen, Luttrell Louis M
Laboratory of Neurosciences, National Institute on Aging Intramural Research Program, Gerontology Research Center, 5600 Nathan Shock Drive, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005 Aug;314(2):485-94. doi: 10.1124/jpet.105.083121. Epub 2005 Apr 1.
The modulation of transmembrane signaling by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitutes the single most important therapeutic target in medicine. Drugs acting on GPCRs have traditionally been classified as agonists, partial agonists, or antagonists based on a two-state model of receptor function embodied in the ternary complex model. Over the past decade, however, many lines of investigation have shown that GPCR signaling exhibits greater diversity and "texture" than previously appreciated. Signal diversity arises from numerous factors, among which are the ability of receptors to adopt multiple "active" states with different effector-coupling profiles; the formation of receptor dimers that exhibit unique pharmacology, signaling, and trafficking; the dissociation of receptor "activation" from desensitization and internalization; and the discovery that non-G protein effectors mediate some aspects of GPCR signaling. At the same time, clustering of GPCRs with their downstream effectors in membrane microdomains and interactions between receptors and a plethora of multidomain scaffolding proteins and accessory/chaperone molecules confer signal preorganization, efficiency, and specificity. In this context, the concept of agonist-selective trafficking of receptor signaling, which recognizes that a bound ligand may select between a menu of active receptor conformations and induce only a subset of the possible response profile, presents the opportunity to develop drugs that change the quality as well as the quantity of efficacy. As a more comprehensive understanding of the complexity of GPCR signaling is developed, the rational design of ligands possessing increased specific efficacy and attenuated side effects may become the standard mode of drug development.
G蛋白偶联受体(GPCRs)介导的跨膜信号转导调节是医学领域最重要的单一治疗靶点。传统上,作用于GPCRs的药物根据三元复合物模型中体现的受体功能二态模型被分类为激动剂、部分激动剂或拮抗剂。然而,在过去十年中,许多研究表明,GPCR信号转导表现出比以前认识到的更大的多样性和“复杂性”。信号多样性源于多种因素,其中包括受体能够采用具有不同效应器偶联特征的多种“活性”状态;形成具有独特药理学、信号转导和转运特性的受体二聚体;受体“激活”与脱敏和内化的解离;以及发现非G蛋白效应器介导GPCR信号转导的某些方面。同时,GPCRs与其下游效应器在膜微区的聚集以及受体与大量多结构域支架蛋白和辅助/伴侣分子之间的相互作用赋予了信号预组织、效率和特异性。在这种背景下,受体信号转导的激动剂选择性转运概念认识到结合的配体可以在一系列活性受体构象中进行选择,并仅诱导可能反应谱的一个子集,这为开发既能改变疗效质量又能改变疗效数量的药物提供了机会。随着对GPCR信号转导复杂性的更全面理解的发展,设计具有更高特异性疗效和更低副作用的配体可能会成为药物开发的标准模式。