Kang Peter B, Preston David C, Raynor Elizabeth M
Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Muscle Nerve. 2005 Jun;31(6):725-9. doi: 10.1002/mus.20329.
Motor involvement in common peroneal neuropathy (CPN) frequently shows a selective pattern with regard to deep and superficial divisions of the peroneal nerve, by clinical examination and needle electromyography. The involvement of the sensory branch of the superficial peroneal nerve (SPN) has not been well established using nerve conduction studies. Among 42 cases of electrophysiologically defined CPN in 35 patients, 37 (88%) had clinical or electrophysiologic evidence for SPN involvement, but only 20 had diminished superficial peroneal sensory response (SPSR) amplitudes. Many of the cases involving normal SPSRs had significant axonal loss involving deep peroneal motor fibers. Sparing of the superficial peroneal sensory fibers provides further evidence for the selective vulnerability of different nerve fascicles to injury. This is an important pattern to recognize; from a practical standpoint, focal segmental conduction abnormalities in the motor nerve and EMG findings can help to differentiate these lesions from L-5 radiculopathy.
通过临床检查和针电极肌电图,在腓总神经病变(CPN)中,运动受累在腓神经深浅分支方面常呈现选择性模式。使用神经传导研究尚未充分证实腓浅神经(SPN)感觉支受累情况。在35例患者的42例经电生理确诊的CPN病例中,37例(88%)有临床或电生理证据表明SPN受累,但仅有20例腓浅感觉反应(SPSR)波幅降低。许多SPSR正常的病例存在累及腓深运动纤维的显著轴突丢失。腓浅感觉纤维保留为不同神经束对损伤的选择性易损性提供了进一步证据。这是一个需要识别的重要模式;从实际角度来看,运动神经中的局灶节段性传导异常和肌电图表现有助于将这些病变与L5神经根病相鉴别。