Abstract
On 27 October 2004 the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network and the Ontario Medical Association (OMA) released reports recommending that needle exchange programs (NEPs) be implemented in prisons, based on evidence that such programs promote and protect the health of both prisoners and prison staff. At the same time, the Scottish Prison Service announced that it was looking at providing such programs, and an Iranian physician reported on a pilot project in his country.
摘要
相似文献
1
Prison needle exchange programs work.
HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev. 2004 Dec;9(3):41-3.
2
Canadian Human Rights Commission recommends prison needle exchange programs.
Can HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev. 2004 Apr;9(1):47-8.
3
UK: legal action on needle exchange programs in prisons dismissed.
HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev. 2005 Aug;10(2):51.
4
Clean switch: the case for prison needle and syringe programs.
HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev. 2009 Dec;14(2):5-19.
5
Methadone, but no needle exchange pilot in Federal prisons.
Can HIV AIDS Policy Law Newsl. 1997;3-4(4-1):26-7, 29.
6
[Comments on the article: Evolution of the need and coverage of opioid substitution and needle exchange programs in Spanish, 1992-2009].
Rev Esp Sanid Penit. 2012 Feb;14(3):116; author reply 117-9. doi: 10.4321/S1575-06202012000300008.
7
[Comments on the article: Evolution of the need and coverage of opioid substitution and needle exchange programs in Spanish, 1992-2009].
Rev Esp Sanid Penit. 2012 Feb;14(3):114-5; author reply 117-9. doi: 10.4321/S1575-06202012000300007.
8
Europe & CEE: prison needle exchange update.
HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev. 2006 Dec;11(2-3):38-9.
9
Inmate claims Canadian policies caused his HIV infection.
AIDS Policy Law. 2001 Sep 14;16(17):9.
10
Prison needle exchange programs rare despite evidence.
CMAJ. 2013 Dec 10;185(18):1563. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4644. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
Zotero 插件