Cheng Shih-Lung, Wang Hao-Chien, Lee Yung-Chie, Yang Pan-Chyr, Kuo Sow-Hsong, Luh Kwen-Tay
Department of Internal Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Ban Chiao, Taiwan.
J Formos Med Assoc. 2005 Mar;104(3):168-73.
The diagnostic value and indications for fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the preoperative assessment of patients with esophageal cancer have not been fully studied. We evaluated the role of fiberoptic bronchoscopic examination in the stage work-up of patients with esophageal cancer and correlated the results with survival time analysis.
The medical records of 153 patients with an initial diagnosis of esophageal cancer were reviewed. Clinical data, bronchoscopic findings, treatment courses, and survival time of these patients were analyzed.
On initial bronchoscopic examinations, distortion/compression of the normal structure and protrusion at the posterior wall of the trachea or bronchus were the most common bronchoscopic findings (35.9%). We stratified patients into 3 subgroups according to bronchoscopic findings of direct invasion, external compression, and negative findings. The symptoms of dyspnea, hoarseness, aspiration and fever were more frequent in patients with direct airway invasion compared with patients with external compression and negative bronchoscopic findings (p < 0.02). Washing and brushing cytology examinations were all negative in patients with external compression of the airway. There was a significant difference of survival time among these 3 groups of patients (direct invasion: 5.6 +/- 0.6 months; external compression: 12.3 +/- 0.9 months; negative findings: 13.3 +/- 1.1 months, p < 0.01). Direct airway invasion and original cancer stage were the most important variables for survival in the multivariate analysis, and the hazard ratio for prognosis was 2.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-4.6) and 4.2 (95% CI, 1.5-9.3), respectively. Twelve patients (80%) with tracheoesophageal (TE) fistulae died within 3 months after diagnosis due to aspiration pneumonia and septic shock.
The role of bronchoscopic examination in patients with esophageal cancer for preoperative evaluation resides in its ability to predict airway invasion and its impact on survival. Advanced cancer stage (stage IV) and direct airway invasion (especially TE fistula) were significantly associated with poor prognosis. These results suggest that patients suffering from dyspnea, hoarseness, aspiration and fever, implicating a high probability of airway invasion, are more likely to benefit from bronchoscopic examination and proper management in order to prevent aspiration or complications.
纤维支气管镜检查在食管癌患者术前评估中的诊断价值及适应证尚未得到充分研究。我们评估了纤维支气管镜检查在食管癌患者分期检查中的作用,并将结果与生存时间分析相关联。
回顾了153例初诊为食管癌患者的病历。分析了这些患者的临床资料、支气管镜检查结果、治疗过程及生存时间。
在初次支气管镜检查中,气管或支气管正常结构的扭曲/受压以及气管后壁的突出是最常见的支气管镜检查结果(35.9%)。根据支气管镜检查发现的直接侵犯、外压及阴性结果,我们将患者分为3个亚组。与外压及支气管镜检查阴性的患者相比,直接侵犯气道的患者出现呼吸困难、声音嘶哑、误吸及发热症状更为频繁(p<0.02)。气道外压患者的冲洗及刷检细胞学检查均为阴性。这3组患者的生存时间存在显著差异(直接侵犯组:5.6±0.6个月;外压组:12.3±0.9个月;阴性结果组:13.3±1.1个月,p<0.01)。在多因素分析中,直接侵犯气道及原发癌分期是生存的最重要变量,预后的风险比分别为2.5(95%置信区间[CI],1.1 - 4.6)和4.2(95%CI,1.5 - 9.3)。12例(80%)气管食管(TE)瘘患者在诊断后3个月内死于吸入性肺炎和感染性休克。
支气管镜检查在食管癌患者术前评估中的作用在于其预测气道侵犯的能力及其对生存的影响。晚期癌(IV期)及直接侵犯气道(尤其是TE瘘)与预后不良显著相关。这些结果表明,出现呼吸困难、声音嘶哑、误吸及发热症状(提示气道侵犯可能性高)的患者更有可能从支气管镜检查及适当处理中获益,以预防误吸或并发症。