Sankaranarayanan Rengaswamy, Nene Bhagwan M, Dinshaw Ketayun A, Mahe Cedric, Jayant Kasturi, Shastri Surendra S, Malvi Sylla G, Chinoy Roshini, Kelkar Rohini, Budukh Atul M, Keskar Vijay, Rajeshwarker Raghevendra, Muwonge Richard, Kane Shubhada, Parkin Donald Maxwell, Chauhan Madanmohan K, Desai Sangeetha, Fontaniere Bernard, Frappart Lucien, Kothari Ashok, Lucas Eric, Panse Nandkumar
Screening Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Int J Cancer. 2005 Sep 10;116(4):617-23. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21050.
The impact of screening by visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), cytology or HPV testing on cervical cancer incidence and mortality is investigated in a cluster randomized controlled trial in India. We report findings after the screening phase, when 52 clusters, with a total of 142,701 women aged 30-59 years in Osmanabad District, India, were randomized into 4 arms for a single round of screening by trained midwives with either VIA, cytology or HPV testing as well as a control group. All laboratory tests were done locally. Test-positive women underwent investigations (colposcopy/biopsy) and treatment in the base hospital. Data on participation, test positivity, positive predictive value and detection rates of cervical neoplasia were analyzed using cluster design methodology. Of the eligible women, 72-74% were screened. Test positivity rates were 14.0% for VIA, 7.0% for cytology and 10.3% for HPV. The detection rate of high-grade lesions was similar in all intervention arms (0.7% for VIA, 1.0% for cytology and 0.9% for HPV testing) (p = 0.06, Mann-Whitney test). While the detection rate for VIA dropped to 0.5% with declining test positivity during the course of the study, it remained constant for cytology and HPV testing. Over 85% of women with high-grade lesions received treatment. Our results show that a high level of participation and good-quality cytology can be achieved in low-resource settings. VIA is a useful alternative but requires careful monitoring. Detection rates obtained by HPV testing were similar to cytology, despite higher investments.
在印度的一项整群随机对照试验中,研究了醋酸肉眼观察法(VIA)、细胞学检查或HPV检测筛查对宫颈癌发病率和死亡率的影响。我们报告了筛查阶段后的结果,当时印度奥斯曼阿巴德区的52个整群,共计142,701名30 - 59岁的女性被随机分为4组,由经过培训的助产士分别采用VIA、细胞学检查或HPV检测进行一轮筛查,还有一个对照组。所有实验室检测均在当地进行。检测呈阳性的女性在基层医院接受了进一步检查(阴道镜检查/活检)和治疗。使用整群设计方法分析了参与率、检测阳性率、阳性预测值以及宫颈肿瘤的检出率。符合条件的女性中,72 - 74%接受了筛查。VIA的检测阳性率为14.0%,细胞学检查为7.0%,HPV检测为10.3%。所有干预组中高级别病变的检出率相似(VIA为0.7%,细胞学检查为1.0%,HPV检测为0.9%)(曼-惠特尼检验,p = 0.06)。在研究过程中,随着检测阳性率下降,VIA的检出率降至0.5%,而细胞学检查和HPV检测的检出率保持不变。超过85%的高级别病变女性接受了治疗。我们的结果表明,在资源匮乏地区可以实现较高的参与率和高质量的细胞学检查。VIA是一种有用的替代方法,但需要仔细监测。尽管HPV检测投入较高,但其获得的检出率与细胞学检查相似。