Duchateau Christianne S J, Stokkel Marcel P M
Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Chest. 2005 Apr;127(4):1152-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.4.1152.
Patients with lung cancer have a relative high risk for second primary cancers. We studied the prevalence of second primary tumors in patients with a diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in their history or at follow-up. Furthermore, we studied survival in subgroups of those patients.
Retrospectively, 860 patients with NSCLC that had been diagnosed in the period from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 1999, were evaluated for second primary cancers either in their history or in the follow-up period. The patients were divided into the following four groups: group I, patients with another primary tumor detected in the follow-up period (n = 44); group II, patients with another primary tumor in their history (n = 148); group III, patients with no other primary tumor found in their history or at follow-up (n = 634); and group IV, patients with more than one other primary tumor in found in their history or at follow-up (n = 34).
The most frequently diagnosed double tumors were located in the lungs, the head and neck region, and the urinary tract. The interval between another malignancy as the first tumor (group II, 83 months) and NSCLC as the second malignancy was significantly longer than vice versa (group I, 14.5 months; p < 0.05). In > 80% of patients, the second primary tumors were diagnosed within 1 year after NSCLC was diagnosed. The 5-year survival rate is significantly better for patients with more than two primary malignancies compared to patients without two primary malignancies and patients with one other tumor in their history (p = 0.004 and 0.012, respectively). The 5-year survival rate in patients with a second tumor in the follow-up period was better than in patients without any other second tumor (p = 0.029). As the TNM stage and therapy were comparable in all subgroups, it could not be used as explanation for the difference in survival rates.
In 25% of patients, additional tumors that were NSCLC were diagnosed either in their history or in the follow-up period. The majority of second tumors following NSCLC are diagnosed within 1 year. Nevertheless, patients with a second tumor tend to have an overall better survival rate than patients without second primaries, suggesting different growth habits.
肺癌患者发生第二原发性癌症的风险相对较高。我们研究了有非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)病史或随访期间患者中第二原发性肿瘤的患病率。此外,我们还研究了这些患者亚组的生存率。
回顾性评估了1990年1月1日至1999年12月31日期间诊断为NSCLC的860例患者,以确定其病史或随访期间是否存在第二原发性癌症。患者被分为以下四组:第一组,随访期间发现有另一原发性肿瘤的患者(n = 44);第二组,病史中有另一原发性肿瘤的患者(n = 148);第三组,病史或随访中未发现其他原发性肿瘤的患者(n = 634);第四组,病史或随访中发现有不止一个其他原发性肿瘤的患者(n = 34)。
最常诊断出的双原发肿瘤位于肺部、头颈部区域和泌尿系统。以另一恶性肿瘤作为第一个肿瘤(第二组,83个月)与以NSCLC作为第二个恶性肿瘤之间的间隔明显长于相反情况(第一组,14.5个月;p < 0.05)。超过80%的患者在NSCLC诊断后1年内被诊断出第二原发性肿瘤。与没有两个原发性恶性肿瘤的患者以及病史中有一个其他肿瘤的患者相比,有两个以上原发性恶性肿瘤的患者5年生存率明显更好(分别为p = 0.004和0.012)。随访期间有第二个肿瘤的患者5年生存率高于没有任何其他第二个肿瘤的患者(p = 0.029)。由于所有亚组的TNM分期和治疗方法具有可比性,因此不能将其作为生存率差异的解释。
25%的患者在其病史或随访期间被诊断出患有其他NSCLC肿瘤。NSCLC之后的大多数第二肿瘤在1年内被诊断出来。然而,有第二个肿瘤的患者总体生存率往往比没有第二原发性肿瘤的患者更好,这表明生长习性不同。