Meng Maxwell V, Elkin Eric P, Latini David M, Duchane Janeen, Carroll Peter R
Department of Urology, Program in Urologic Oncology, Urologic Outcomes Research Group, University of California-San Francisco Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94115-1711, USA.
J Urol. 2005 May;173(5):1557-61. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000154610.81916.81.
Pretreatment risk assessment models facilitate more appropriate selection of treatment for prostate cancer. However, men with high risk disease remain a challenge with significant potential for primary treatment failure. We characterize patterns of treatment for high risk prostate cancer in a community based cohort.
In the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor (CaPSURE) database, a longitudinal disease registry of men with prostate cancer, we identified those with nonmetastatic, high risk disease based on T stage, tumor grade and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA). Differences in primary treatment, and the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in patients at low, intermediate and high risk were assessed. In the high risk cohort predictors of the type of primary treatment, and the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant androgen therapy were identified.
Of the cancers 34%, 40% and 26% were low, intermediate and high risk, respectively. Differences in primary treatment type among the 3 risk groups were statistically significant (p <0.0001) with increasing external beam radiation therapy and androgen deprivation, and decreased surgery, brachytherapy and surveillance in men with high risk cancers. In this group older age, higher PSA and nonprivate insurance were associated with decreased use of radical prostatectomy. More than half of the men at high risk receiving radiation therapy also received androgen deprivation, which was significantly higher than in the low and intermediate risk groups (p <0.0001). Factors associated with androgen deprivation in high risk disease were primary therapy, PSA, Gleason sum, T stage, body mass index, insurance status and ethnicity. PSA and Gleason sum were the primary determinants of adjuvant radiation after prostatectomy.
Men with high risk but nonmetastatic prostate cancer are more likely to receive radiation therapy as well as androgen deprivation with the latter as primary therapy or in conjunction with local treatment. These data stress the importance of pretreatment risk stratification, education regarding appropriate combinations of local and systemic therapies, and the consideration of novel clinical trials in patients at higher risk.
治疗前风险评估模型有助于更合理地选择前列腺癌的治疗方案。然而,高危疾病男性患者仍然是一个挑战,存在显著的初始治疗失败风险。我们在一个基于社区的队列中描述高危前列腺癌的治疗模式。
在前列腺癌战略泌尿学研究计划(CaPSURE)数据库中,这是一个前列腺癌男性患者的纵向疾病登记库,我们根据T分期、肿瘤分级和血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)确定了那些患有非转移性高危疾病的患者。评估了低、中、高危患者在初始治疗以及新辅助和辅助治疗使用方面的差异。在高危队列中,确定了初始治疗类型以及新辅助和辅助雄激素治疗使用情况的预测因素。
在这些癌症患者中,低危、中危和高危分别占34%、40%和26%。三个风险组在初始治疗类型上的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.0001),高危癌症男性患者接受外照射放疗和雄激素剥夺治疗的比例增加,而手术、近距离放疗和观察的比例下降。在这组患者中,年龄较大、PSA水平较高和非私人保险与根治性前列腺切除术的使用减少有关。超过一半接受放疗的高危男性患者也接受了雄激素剥夺治疗,这一比例显著高于低危和中危组(p<0.0001)。高危疾病中与雄激素剥夺治疗相关的因素包括初始治疗、PSA、 Gleason评分总和、T分期、体重指数、保险状况和种族。PSA和Gleason评分总和是前列腺切除术后辅助放疗的主要决定因素。
高危但非转移性前列腺癌男性患者更有可能接受放疗以及雄激素剥夺治疗,后者作为主要治疗或与局部治疗联合使用。这些数据强调了治疗前风险分层的重要性、关于局部和全身治疗适当组合的教育以及对高危患者进行新型临床试验的考虑。