• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Kaiser Permanente Southern California: 15-Year Experience.南加州凯撒医疗集团的根治性前列腺切除术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术:15年经验
Perm J. 2019;23. doi: 10.7812/TPP/17-233.
2
Oncological Outcome After Radical Prostatectomy without Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Localized Prostate Cancer: Follow-up Results in a Single Institution.根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌且不进行盆腔淋巴结清扫术的肿瘤学结局:单中心随访结果。
Cancer Invest. 2019;37(10):524-530. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2019.1675076. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
3
Extent of lymph node dissection improves survival in prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy without lymph node invasion.在接受根治性前列腺切除术且无淋巴结侵犯的前列腺癌患者中,淋巴结清扫范围可提高生存率。
Prostate. 2018 May;78(6):469-475. doi: 10.1002/pros.23491. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
4
Pelvic lymph node dissection and its extent on survival benefit in prostate cancer patients with a risk of lymph node invasion >5%: a propensity score matching analysis from SEER database.盆腔淋巴结清扫术及其范围对淋巴结侵犯风险>5%的前列腺癌患者生存获益的影响:来自 SEER 数据库的倾向评分匹配分析。
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 29;9(1):17985. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54261-4.
5
Indication for and extension of pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis of five European institutions.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术时盆腔淋巴结清扫的适应证和范围:来自五家欧洲机构的分析。
Eur Urol. 2014 Oct;66(4):635-43. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.059. Epub 2014 Jan 4.
6
The impact of extended lymph node dissection versus neoadjuvant therapy with limited lymph node dissection on biochemical recurrence in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.扩大淋巴结清扫术与新辅助治疗联合有限淋巴结清扫术对接受根治性前列腺切除术的高危前列腺癌患者生化复发的影响:一项多机构分析。
Med Oncol. 2017 Jan;34(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s12032-016-0859-0. Epub 2016 Nov 26.
7
Reconsidering the role of pelvic lymph node dissection with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in an era of improving radiological staging techniques.在放射影像学分期技术不断进步的时代,重新思考根治性前列腺切除术时行盆腔淋巴结清扫术在前列腺癌中的作用。
World J Urol. 2018 Jan;36(1):15-20. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2119-0. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
8
Algorithm for selecting men for pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy based on clinical risk factors in an Australian population.基于澳大利亚人群中的临床危险因素选择接受根治性前列腺切除术时行盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)的男性的算法。
BJU Int. 2012 Apr;109 Suppl 3:48-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11047.x.
9
No difference in six-year biochemical failure rates with or without pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in low-risk patients with localized prostate cancer.在局限性前列腺癌的低风险患者中,根治性前列腺切除术期间进行或不进行盆腔淋巴结清扫,六年生化复发率无差异。
Urology. 2004 Mar;63(3):528-31. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.064.
10
The extent of pelvic lymph node dissection correlates with the biochemical recurrence rate in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.盆腔淋巴结清扫术的范围与中高危前列腺癌患者的生化复发率相关。
BJU Int. 2011 Oct;108(8):1262-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10016.x. Epub 2011 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The role and controversy of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer treatment: a focused review.盆腔淋巴结清扫术在前列腺癌治疗中的作用和争议:重点综述。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb 26;22(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03344-2.
2
Identification of Promising Drug Candidates against Prostate Cancer through Computationally-Driven Drug Repurposing.通过计算驱动的药物再利用鉴定治疗前列腺癌的有前途的候选药物。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Feb 5;24(4):3135. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043135.
3
Ga-PSMA-11 PET has the potential to improve patient selection for extended pelvic lymph node dissection in intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer.镓-PSMA-11正电子发射断层扫描(Ga-PSMA-11 PET)有潜力改善中高危前列腺癌患者扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的患者选择。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Jan;47(1):147-159. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04511-4. Epub 2019 Sep 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Preoperative Risk Group Stratification on Oncologic Outcomes of Patients with Adverse Pathologic Findings at Radical Prostatectomy.术前风险分组分层对根治性前列腺切除术中病理结果不良患者肿瘤学结局的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 7;11(10):e0164497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164497. eCollection 2016.
2
Oncologic Outcome of Radical Prostatectomy as Monotherapy for Men with High-risk Prostate Cancer.根治性前列腺切除术作为高危前列腺癌男性单一疗法的肿瘤学结局
Curr Urol. 2016 May;9(2):67-72. doi: 10.1159/000442856. Epub 2016 May 20.
3
Biochemical recurrence-free survival and pathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.高危前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后的无生化复发生存率及病理结果
BMC Urol. 2016 Jun 8;16(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12894-016-0146-6.
4
Evolution and oncological outcomes of a contemporary radical prostatectomy practice in a UK regional tertiary referral centre.英国地区三级转诊中心当代根治性前列腺切除术的发展及肿瘤学结果
BJU Int. 2016 Nov;118(5):779-784. doi: 10.1111/bju.13513. Epub 2016 May 24.
5
The importance of surgical margins in prostate cancer.手术切缘在前列腺癌中的重要性。
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;113(3):310-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.24109. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
6
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: An update on functional and oncologic outcomes, techniques, and advancements in technology.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术:功能和肿瘤学结果、技术及技术进展的最新情况
J Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;112(7):746-52. doi: 10.1002/jso.24040. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
7
Outcomes of patients with lymph node metastasis treated with radical prostatectomy and adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy in a Chinese population: results from a cohort study.中国人群中接受根治性前列腺切除术和辅助雄激素剥夺治疗的淋巴结转移患者的结局:一项队列研究的结果
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 May 6;13:172. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0597-3.
8
High-risk prostate cancer: from definition to contemporary management.高危前列腺癌:从定义到当代管理。
Eur Urol. 2012 Jun;61(6):1096-106. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.031. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
9
Radical prostatectomy as primary treatment of high-risk prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术作为高危前列腺癌的主要治疗方法。
Curr Urol Rep. 2012 Apr;13(2):179-86. doi: 10.1007/s11934-012-0240-6.
10
The role of surgery in high-risk localised prostate cancer.手术在高危局限性前列腺癌中的作用。
BJU Int. 2012 Mar;109(5):648-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10596.x. Epub 2011 Sep 27.

南加州凯撒医疗集团的根治性前列腺切除术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术:15年经验

Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Kaiser Permanente Southern California: 15-Year Experience.

作者信息

Banapour Pooya, Schumacher Andrew, Lin Jane C, Finley David S

机构信息

Department of Urology, Sunset Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.

Department of Oncology, Sunset Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

Perm J. 2019;23. doi: 10.7812/TPP/17-233.

DOI:10.7812/TPP/17-233
PMID:30939263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6380477/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Radical prostatectomy (RP) with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is the standard treatment of high-risk prostate cancer. High-risk patients and those with lymph node metastasis (LNM) require further treatment. We review outcomes of RP+PLND in Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC).

METHODS

Patients who underwent RP+PLND in KPSC from January 1, 2001, to July 1, 2015 were included. Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed for demographic information and clinicopathologic data which were used to calculate positive surgical margin rate, LNM, adjuvant treatment, 5-year biochemical recurrence, and overall survival. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with margin positivity.

RESULTS

Patients (N = 1829) underwent RP+PLND (241 high-risk, 943 intermediate-risk, 645 low-risk). Positive margin rates were 17.8%, 14.8%, and 11.9% in the high, intermediate- and low-risk groups. Biochemical recurrence rates were 22% in high-risk and 12.1% in the low-risk category. Androgen deprivation use was 4.1% in the high-risk group and 0.9% in the low-risk group. Five-year overall survival was 92.5% in lymph node-positive patients and 94.9% in lymph node-negative patients (p = 0.8). On multivariate analysis, age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.02, p = 0.02), prebiopsy prostate-specific antigen (OR = 1.02, p < 0.001), and clinical T stage (OR = 1.49, p = 0.01) were associated with margin positivity.

CONCLUSION

In KPSC, RP+PLND was performed in patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer. Age, prebiopsy prostate-specific antigen, and clinical stage were associated with positive surgical margins in patients with LNM. Recipients of RP+PLND with LNM and positive surgical margins required adjuvant treatment.

摘要

引言

根治性前列腺切除术(RP)联合盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)是高危前列腺癌的标准治疗方法。高危患者及伴有淋巴结转移(LNM)的患者需要进一步治疗。我们回顾了南加州凯撒医疗集团(KPSC)中RP+PLND的治疗结果。

方法

纳入2001年1月1日至2015年7月1日在KPSC接受RP+PLND的患者。回顾患者病历以获取人口统计学信息和临床病理数据,用于计算手术切缘阳性率、LNM、辅助治疗、5年生化复发率和总生存率。采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析确定与切缘阳性相关的因素。

结果

患者(N = 1829)接受了RP+PLND(241例高危、943例中危、645例低危)。高危、中危和低危组的切缘阳性率分别为17.8%、14.8%和11.9%。高危组的生化复发率为22%,低危组为12.1%。高危组雄激素剥夺治疗的使用率为4.1%,低危组为0.9%。淋巴结阳性患者的5年总生存率为92.5%,淋巴结阴性患者为94.9%(p = 0.8)。多因素分析显示,年龄(比值比[OR]=1.02,p = 0.02)、活检前前列腺特异性抗原(OR = 1.02,p < 0.001)和临床T分期(OR = 1.49,p = 0.01)与切缘阳性相关。

结论

在KPSC,低危、中危和高危前列腺癌患者均接受了RP+PLND。年龄、活检前前列腺特异性抗原和临床分期与LNM患者的手术切缘阳性相关。伴有LNM且手术切缘阳性的RP+PLND患者需要辅助治疗。