• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Criteria how to choose adequate methodology and relevant variables for assessment of quality of primary healthcare].

作者信息

Toromanović Selim, Masić Izet, Novo Ahmed, Kudumović Mensura, Zunić Lejla

机构信息

DZ Cazin, Medicinski fakultet Univerziteta u Sarajevu, Bosna i Hercegovina.

出版信息

Med Arh. 2005;59(1):23-6.

PMID:15822679
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Research of satisfaction of patients in the area of primary health care (PHC) and especially criteria how to choose best methodology and the relevant variables guided to the situation where activities were focused on description of the basic structure and processes of health care rather than on identification of needs for services and on result based assessment and satisfaction of patients with provided service. To give advantage to any of methodologies is inexplicable problem and depend of factors beyond of health service control.

PURPOSE

Aim of this paper is to review existing measurements of healthcare for ones who intend to use measurements of quality of healthcare for clinical and research purposes and to recommend criteria how to choose adequate methodology and relevant variables for assessment of quality of primary healthcare.

METHODOLOGY

For our study we used experience of the Cathedra for Medical Informatics, Medical faculty, University of Sarajevo with emphasis on research of quality of PHC. We selected over 3,000 users of PHC (patients-adults) in PHC units in ten cantons of Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

RESULTS

Statistically significant results we got when we crossed general attitude of patients about quality of healthcare with the following variables: place where patient receive healthcare, consultation with patients about patients' rights and life styles. We have not got statistically significant results when we crossed the following variables with general attitude of patients: distance from place of living to place where patients get healthcare, examination schedule in the units of PHC, continuity of healthcare, organization of field service and possibility to choose physician or nurse.

CONCLUSION

Very often researchers create their own methods of measurement instead to carry out systematic review of existing ones to enable them to find appropriate one. In this paper we recommended guidelines for finding the most appropriate methods of health measurement using experience of the Cathedra for Medical Informatics, Medical faculty in Sarajevo.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Criteria how to choose adequate methodology and relevant variables for assessment of quality of primary healthcare].
Med Arh. 2005;59(1):23-6.
2
[Medical informatics education at medical schools in Bosnia and Herzegovina].[波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那医学院校的医学信息学教育]
Acta Med Croatica. 2006 Dec;60(5):463-9.
3
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
4
[Quality of and quality assurance in health care preventive health care].[医疗保健中的质量与质量保证——预防保健]
Med Arh. 2003;57(3):189-96.
5
Perceptions of primary care professionals on quality of services in rural Greece: a qualitative study.希腊农村地区基层医疗专业人员对服务质量的认知:一项定性研究。
Rural Remote Health. 2012;12:2156. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
6
Individual determinants of primary healthcare utilisation in Gaza Strip, Palestine.巴勒斯坦加沙地带初级医疗保健利用的个体决定因素。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Aug;62(8):701-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2007.065243.
7
Patients' evaluation of primary health care services in Gjilan region, Kosovo.科索沃吉兰地区患者对初级卫生保健服务的评价。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2014 Mar;36(1):161-9. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdt041. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
8
Assessing the quality of healthcare provided to children.评估为儿童提供的医疗保健质量。
Health Serv Res. 1998 Oct;33(4 Pt 2):1059-90.
9
A standardised and validated patient survey in primary care: introducing the New Zealand General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (NZGPAQ).初级保健中的标准化且经过验证的患者调查:介绍新西兰全科医疗评估问卷(NZGPAQ)。
N Z Med J. 2013 Apr 5;126(1372):47-54.
10
[Quality assesment of education at Faculty of Medicine University of Sarajevo].[萨拉热窝大学医学院教育质量评估]
Med Arh. 2006;60(6):396-400.

引用本文的文献

1
An Overview of Human Resources and Capacity in Health Care Institutions in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina in the Context of Responding to the COVID 19 Pandemic.波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那联邦医疗机构在应对新冠疫情背景下的人力资源与能力概述
Mater Sociomed. 2021 Mar;33(1):56-59. doi: 10.5455/msm.2021.33.56-59.
2
Intrafamilial Spread of COVID-19 Infection Within Population in Bosnia and Herzegovina.波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那境内人群中新冠病毒感染的家庭内传播
Mater Sociomed. 2021 Mar;33(1):4-9. doi: 10.5455/msm.2021.33.4-9.
3
A Survey on Clients' Opinions in Isfahan's Public Hospitals About Effective Factors in the Fulfillment of Referral System.
伊斯法罕公立医院患者对转诊系统实施影响因素的意见调查
Acta Inform Med. 2013 Mar;21(1):51-5. doi: 10.5455/aim.2012.21.51-55.
4
Assessment of Medical Records Module of Health Information System According to ISO 9241-10.根据ISO 9241-10对健康信息系统的医疗记录模块进行评估。
Acta Inform Med. 2013 Mar;21(1):36-41. doi: 10.5455/aim.2012.21.36-41.
5
District health information system assessment: a case study in iran.地区卫生信息系统评估:伊朗的一个案例研究
Acta Inform Med. 2013 Mar;21(1):30-5. doi: 10.5455/aim.2012.21.30-35.