• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伴有感觉测试的吞咽功能灵活内镜评估:1340例连续检查的患者特征及安全性分析

Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing: patient characteristics and analysis of safety in 1,340 consecutive examinations.

作者信息

Aviv Jonathan E, Murry Thomas, Zschommler Anne, Cohen Manderly, Gartner Carolyn

机构信息

Voice and Swallowing Center, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, Columbia University Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York 10032, USA.

出版信息

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2005 Mar;114(3):173-6. doi: 10.1177/000348940511400301.

DOI:10.1177/000348940511400301
PMID:15825564
Abstract

Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST) is a comprehensive endoscopic assessment of the sensory and motor components of a swallow. Previous studies addressing patient safety issues with respect to FEESST included relatively small numbers of patients and paid almost no attention to patient characteristics. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of FEESST-related complications in the outpatient and inpatient settings and to analyze patient diagnoses that led to the performance of FEESST. We performed a prospective study of FEESST complications in 1,340 consecutive evaluations performed over a 4 1/2-year period. The primary outcome variables were incidence of epistaxis and airway compromise. The secondary outcome variable was underlying patient diagnoses. The incidence of epistaxis was 1 in 1,340 (0.07%). There were no instances of airway compromise. Stroke was the most common reason for the performance of FEESST (343; 25.6%), followed by cardiac-related dysphagia (298; 22.2%) following open heart surgery (169/298; 56.7%), heart attack, congestive heart failure, or new arrhythmia. The remaining causes were head and neck cancer (207; 15.4%), pulmonary disease (141; 10.5%), chronic neurologic disease (124; 9.3%), and acid reflux disease (80; 6.0%). We conclude that FEESST is a relatively safe procedure for the sensory and motor assessment of dysphagia in a cohort of patients with a wide variety of underlying diagnoses. The emergence of cardiac surgery as a common cause of dysphagia warrants further study.

摘要

吞咽功能的柔性内镜评估及感觉测试(FEESST)是对吞咽的感觉和运动成分进行的全面内镜评估。以往针对FEESST患者安全问题的研究纳入的患者数量相对较少,且几乎未关注患者特征。本研究的目的是确定门诊和住院环境中FEESST相关并发症的发生率,并分析导致进行FEESST的患者诊断情况。我们对在4年半时间内连续进行的1340次FEESST评估进行了前瞻性研究。主要结局变量是鼻出血和气道受损的发生率。次要结局变量是患者的基础诊断。鼻出血的发生率为1/1340(0.07%)。未发生气道受损情况。中风是进行FEESST最常见的原因(343例;25.6%),其次是心脏直视手术后与心脏相关的吞咽困难(298例;22.2%)(169/298;56.7%)、心脏病发作、充血性心力衰竭或新发心律失常。其余原因包括头颈癌(207例;15.4%)、肺部疾病(141例;10.5%)、慢性神经疾病(124例;9.3%)和胃酸反流疾病(80例;6.0%)。我们得出结论,对于一大群有各种基础诊断的患者,FEESST是一种相对安全的吞咽困难感觉和运动评估方法。心脏手术作为吞咽困难的常见原因这一情况值得进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing: patient characteristics and analysis of safety in 1,340 consecutive examinations.伴有感觉测试的吞咽功能灵活内镜评估:1340例连续检查的患者特征及安全性分析
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2005 Mar;114(3):173-6. doi: 10.1177/000348940511400301.
2
The safety of flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST): an analysis of 500 consecutive evaluations.经感觉测试的吞咽功能软性内镜评估(FEESST)的安全性:对500例连续评估的分析
Dysphagia. 2000 Winter;15(1):39-44. doi: 10.1007/s004559910008.
3
FEESST: a new bedside endoscopic test of the motor and sensory components of swallowing.FEESST:一种用于吞咽运动和感觉成分的新型床旁内镜检查
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1998 May;107(5 Pt 1):378-87. doi: 10.1177/000348949810700503.
4
Patient-controlled comparison of flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST) and videofluoroscopy.患者自控的吞咽功能的软性内镜评估与感觉测试(FEESST)和电视荧光吞咽功能检查的比较
Laryngoscope. 2006 May;116(5):821-5. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000214670.40604.45.
5
The safety of flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing in an outpatient otolaryngology setting.门诊耳鼻喉科环境下进行吞咽功能的柔性内镜评估及感觉测试的安全性。
Laryngoscope. 2003 Jan;113(1):21-4. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200301000-00004.
6
Endoscopic evaluation of swallowing as an alternative to 24-hour pH monitoring for diagnosis of extraesophageal reflux.吞咽的内镜评估作为24小时pH监测的替代方法用于诊断食管外反流。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2000 Oct;184:25-7. doi: 10.1177/0003489400109s1006.
7
Prospective, randomized outcome study of endoscopy versus modified barium swallow in patients with dysphagia.吞咽困难患者内镜检查与改良吞钡检查的前瞻性随机结果研究。
Laryngoscope. 2000 Apr;110(4):563-74. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200004000-00008.
8
Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST) in healthy controls.健康对照者的吞咽功能纤维内镜评估及感觉测试(FEESST)
Dysphagia. 1998 Spring;13(2):87-92. doi: 10.1007/PL00009561.
9
In-office evaluation of swallowing: FEES, pharyngeal squeeze maneuver, and FEESST.办公室吞咽评估:纤维内镜吞咽功能检查、咽部挤压动作及纤维内镜吞咽功能检查改良版
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013 Feb;46(1):31-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2012.08.015.
10
Cost-effectiveness of two types of dysphagia care in head and neck cancer: a preliminary report.头颈部癌症两种吞咽困难护理方式的成本效益:初步报告
Ear Nose Throat J. 2001 Aug;80(8):553-6, 558.

引用本文的文献

1
[Swallowing and swallowing disorders at the focus of otorhinolaryngology : From diagnosis to individualized treatment].[吞咽及吞咽障碍:耳鼻咽喉科的核心问题——从诊断到个体化治疗]
HNO. 2025 Apr 9. doi: 10.1007/s00106-025-01630-3.
2
Upper Airway Sensory Testing in Dysphagia - Implications for Clinical Practice and Future Research Directions.吞咽困难中的上气道感觉测试——对临床实践和未来研究方向的启示
Dysphagia. 2024 Dec 3. doi: 10.1007/s00455-024-10789-w.
3
A Modified Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing Evaluating Esophageal Dysphagia by a Capsule: A Pilot Study.
一种改良的吞咽功能纤维内镜评估:通过胶囊评估食管吞咽困难的初步研究。
Dysphagia. 2025 Feb;40(1):263-270. doi: 10.1007/s00455-024-10724-z. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
4
Post-extubation Assessment of Laryngeal Symptoms and Severity (PALSS) in the Intensive Care Unit: Protocol of a Prospective Cohort Study.重症监护病房拔管后喉部症状及严重程度评估(PALSS):一项前瞻性队列研究方案
ORL Head Neck Nurs. 2024;42(1):8-21.
5
[Prevalence of mucosal injuries during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in the presence of a nasogastric tube].[在留置鼻胃管的情况下进行吞咽功能的柔性内镜评估时黏膜损伤的患病率]
HNO. 2024 Jan;72(1):25-31. doi: 10.1007/s00106-023-01361-3. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
6
Phoniatricians and otorhinolaryngologists approaching oropharyngeal dysphagia: an update on FEES.言语矫治学家和耳鼻喉科医师处理口咽吞咽困难:FEES 的最新进展。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jun;279(6):2727-2742. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07161-1. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
7
Impact of laryngeal sequelae on voice- and swallowing-related outcomes in paracoccidioidomycosis.喉后遗症对副球孢子菌病中与嗓音和吞咽相关结局的影响。
J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2020 Aug 17;26:e20200008. doi: 10.1590/1678-9199-JVATITD-2020-0008.
8
Relationship Between Laryngeal Sensory Deficits, Aspiration, and Pneumonia in Patients with Dysphagia.吞咽困难患者喉感觉功能障碍、误吸与肺炎之间的关系
Dysphagia. 2018 Apr;33(2):192-199. doi: 10.1007/s00455-017-9845-8. Epub 2017 Sep 2.
9
Accuracy and reliability of the sensory test performed using the laryngopharyngeal endoscopic esthesiometer and rangefinder in patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnoea hypopnoea: protocol for a prospective double-blinded, randomised, exploratory study.使用喉咽内镜感觉测量仪和测距仪对疑似阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气患者进行感觉测试的准确性和可靠性:一项前瞻性双盲、随机、探索性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e015235. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015235.
10
Reliability of a laryngo-pharyngeal esthesiometer and a method for measuring laryngo-pharyngeal mechano-sensitivity in a prospectively recruited cohort of patients.在一组前瞻性招募的患者队列中,喉咽感觉测量仪的可靠性及一种测量喉咽机械敏感性的方法。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jul;274(7):2861-2870. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4536-5. Epub 2017 Mar 24.