Christensen Angi M
The University of Tennessee, Department of Anthropology, Knoxville, TN, USA.
J Forensic Sci. 2005 Jan;50(1):18-22.
The use of frontal sinus radiographs in positive identification has become an increasingly applied and accepted technique among forensic anthropologists, radiologists, and pathologists. From an evidentiary standpoint, however, it is important to know whether frontal sinus radiographs are a reliable method for confirming or rejecting an identification, and standardized methods should be applied when making comparisons. The purpose of the following study is to develop an objective, standardized comparison method, and investigate the reliability of that method. Elliptic Fourier analysis (EFA) was used to assess the variation in 808 outlines of frontal sinuses by calculating likelihood ratios and posterior probabilities from EFA coefficients. Results show that using EFA coefficient comparison to estimate the probability of a correct identification is a reliable technique, and EFA comparison of frontal sinus outlines is recommended when it may be necessary to provide quantitative substantiation for a forensic identification based on these structures.
在法医人类学家、放射科医生和病理学家中,使用额窦X光片进行身份鉴定已成为一种应用越来越广泛且被认可的技术。然而,从证据的角度来看,了解额窦X光片是否是确认或排除身份鉴定的可靠方法很重要,并且在进行比较时应采用标准化方法。以下研究的目的是开发一种客观、标准化的比较方法,并研究该方法的可靠性。椭圆傅里叶分析(EFA)用于通过计算EFA系数的似然比和后验概率来评估808个额窦轮廓的变化。结果表明,使用EFA系数比较来估计正确鉴定的概率是一种可靠的技术,并且当有必要基于这些结构为法医鉴定提供定量证据时,建议对额窦轮廓进行EFA比较。