• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用促红细胞生成素和粒细胞集落刺激因子治疗骨髓增生异常综合征贫血的长期结果

Long-term outcome of treatment of anemia in MDS with erythropoietin and G-CSF.

作者信息

Jädersten Martin, Montgomery Scott M, Dybedal Ingunn, Porwit-MacDonald Anna, Hellström-Lindberg Eva

机构信息

Dept of Hematology, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Blood. 2005 Aug 1;106(3):803-11. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-10-3872. Epub 2005 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1182/blood-2004-10-3872
PMID:15840690
Abstract

We report long-term results of treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with erythropoietin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). A total of 129 patients were followed up 45 months after last inclusion in the Nordic MDS Group studies. Erythroid response rate was 39% and median response duration 23 months (range, 3-116 months or more). Complete responders showed longer response duration than partial responders (29 versus 12 months, P = .006). The International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) groups Low/Intermediate-1 (Low/Int-1) had longer response duration than Int-2/High (25 versus 7 months, P = .002). The time until 25% developed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was longer in the good and intermediate predictive groups for erythroid response compared with the poor predictive group (52 versus 13 months, P = .008). Only 1 of 20 long-term responders developed AML. We assessed the effect on long-term outcome by comparing treated patients with untreated patients selected from the IPSS database using multivariate Cox regression, adjusting for major prognostic variables. There was no difference in survival (odds ratio [OR], 0.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-1.2; P = .55) or risk of AML evolution (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.7-2.2; P = .40) between treated and untreated patients. Patients with high/intermediate probability of response and with IPSS Low/Int-1 show frequent and durable responses without adverse effects on outcome, while other patients should not be considered candidates for this treatment.

摘要

我们报告了使用促红细胞生成素和粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)治疗骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)的长期结果。共有129例患者在最后一次纳入北欧MDS组研究后随访了45个月。红系反应率为39%,中位反应持续时间为23个月(范围为3 - 116个月或更长)。完全缓解者的反应持续时间比部分缓解者更长(29个月对12个月,P = 0.006)。国际预后评分系统(IPSS)中的低危/中危-1(Low/Int-1)组的反应持续时间比中危-2/高危(Int-2/High)组长(25个月对7个月,P = 0.002)。与预后不良组相比,红系反应预后良好和中等的组中,直至25%的患者发生急性髓系白血病(AML)的时间更长(52个月对13个月,P = 0.008)。20例长期缓解者中只有1例发生了AML。我们通过使用多变量Cox回归比较治疗患者与从IPSS数据库中选择的未治疗患者,并对主要预后变量进行校正,评估了对长期结局的影响。治疗组和未治疗组在生存率(比值比[OR],0.9;95%置信区间[CI],0.7 - 1.2;P = 0.55)或AML进展风险(OR,1.3;95% CI,0.7 - 2.2;P = 0.40)方面没有差异。反应概率高/中等且IPSS为低危/中危-1的患者表现出频繁且持久的反应,且对结局无不良影响,而其他患者不应被视为该治疗的候选者。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcome of treatment of anemia in MDS with erythropoietin and G-CSF.使用促红细胞生成素和粒细胞集落刺激因子治疗骨髓增生异常综合征贫血的长期结果
Blood. 2005 Aug 1;106(3):803-11. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-10-3872. Epub 2005 Apr 19.
2
Erythropoietin and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor treatment associated with improved survival in myelodysplastic syndrome.促红细胞生成素和粒细胞集落刺激因子治疗与骨髓增生异常综合征患者生存率提高相关。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20;26(21):3607-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4906. Epub 2008 Jun 16.
3
Adding growth factors or interleukin-3 to erythropoietin has limited effects on anemia of transfusion-dependent patients with myelodysplastic syndromes unresponsive to erythropoietin alone.对于单独使用促红细胞生成素无反应的输血依赖型骨髓增生异常综合征患者,在促红细胞生成素中添加生长因子或白细胞介素-3对贫血的治疗效果有限。
Haematologica. 2001 Jan;86(1):44-51.
4
High response rate and improved exercise capacity and quality of life with a new regimen of darbepoetin alfa with or without filgrastim in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a phase II study by the GFM.新型低危骨髓增生异常综合征沙利度胺联合地西他滨方案疗效显著,改善患者运动能力和生活质量:GFM Ⅱ期研究
Ann Hematol. 2013 May;92(5):621-31. doi: 10.1007/s00277-013-1686-4. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
5
Erythropoietin plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is better than erythropoietin alone to treat anemia in low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: results from a randomized single-centre study.促红细胞生成素联合粒细胞集落刺激因子治疗低危骨髓增生异常综合征贫血优于单用促红细胞生成素:一项单中心随机研究结果
Ann Hematol. 2006 Mar;85(3):174-80. doi: 10.1007/s00277-005-0044-6. Epub 2006 Jan 12.
6
A validated decision model for treating the anaemia of myelodysplastic syndromes with erythropoietin + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: significant effects on quality of life.一种用于治疗骨髓增生异常综合征贫血的经验证的决策模型:促红细胞生成素+粒细胞集落刺激因子对生活质量有显著影响。
Br J Haematol. 2003 Mar;120(6):1037-46. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04153.x.
7
Predictive factors of response and survival in myelodysplastic syndrome treated with erythropoietin and G-CSF: the GFM experience.促红细胞生成素和粒细胞集落刺激因子治疗骨髓增生异常综合征的反应和生存预测因素:GFM研究经验
Blood. 2008 Jan 15;111(2):574-82. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-06-096370. Epub 2007 Oct 16.
8
Erythropoietin plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes. Identification of a subgroup of responders. The Spanish Erythropathology Group.促红细胞生成素联合粒细胞集落刺激因子治疗骨髓增生异常综合征。反应者亚组的鉴定。西班牙红细胞病研究组。
Haematologica. 1999 Dec;84(12):1058-64.
9
Treatment of anemia in myelodysplastic syndromes with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor plus erythropoietin: results from a randomized phase II study and long-term follow-up of 71 patients.粒细胞集落刺激因子联合促红细胞生成素治疗骨髓增生异常综合征贫血:一项随机II期研究结果及71例患者的长期随访
Blood. 1998 Jul 1;92(1):68-75.
10
[Clinical efficacy analysis of recombinant human erythropoietin in the treatment of lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes].重组人促红细胞生成素治疗低危骨髓增生异常综合征的临床疗效分析
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Jan;35(1):18-23. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2014.01.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Low-risk MDS-A spotlight on precision medicine for mutated patients.低风险骨髓增生异常综合征——聚焦于针对突变患者的精准医学
Hemasphere. 2025 Mar 21;9(3):e70103. doi: 10.1002/hem3.70103. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Structural analysis and blood-enriching effects comparison based on biological potency of Angelica sinensis polysaccharides.基于当归多糖生物活性的结构分析及补血效果比较
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jun 17;15:1405342. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1405342. eCollection 2024.
3
Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes for Older Patients: Current State of Science, Challenges, and Opportunities.
老年骨髓增生异常综合征的治疗:科学现状、挑战与机遇。
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2024 Jun;19(3):138-150. doi: 10.1007/s11899-024-00733-y. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
4
Transfusion avoidance in myelodysplastic neoplasms.骨髓增生异常肿瘤中的输血回避。
Curr Opin Hematol. 2024 Mar 1;31(2):40-46. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000794. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
5
Myelodysplastic syndromes: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management.骨髓增生异常综合征:2023 年关于诊断、风险分层和治疗的更新。
Am J Hematol. 2023 Aug;98(8):1307-1325. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26984. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
6
New Approaches to Myelodysplastic Syndrome Treatment.骨髓增生异常综合征治疗的新方法。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022 May;23(5):668-687. doi: 10.1007/s11864-022-00965-1. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
7
Blood-Enriching Effects and Immune-Regulation Mechanism of Steam-Processed Polysaccharide in Blood Deficiency Syndrome Mice.血虚证小鼠蒸制多糖的补血作用及免疫调节机制。
Front Immunol. 2022 Feb 17;13:813676. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.813676. eCollection 2022.
8
Management of the Older Patient with Myelodysplastic Syndrome.老年骨髓增生异常综合征患者的管理。
Drugs Aging. 2021 Sep;38(9):751-767. doi: 10.1007/s40266-021-00881-3. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
9
Current Therapy of the Patients with MDS: Walking towards Personalized Therapy.骨髓增生异常综合征患者的当前治疗:迈向个性化治疗
J Clin Med. 2021 May 13;10(10):2107. doi: 10.3390/jcm10102107.
10
Transfusion-dependent anaemia treatment using continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (epoetin β pegol) and roxadustat after darbepoetin treatment failure in low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: a case report.低危骨髓增生异常综合征中,达贝泊汀治疗失败后使用连续促红细胞生成素受体激活剂(聚乙二醇化促红细胞生成素β)和罗沙司他治疗输血依赖型贫血:一例报告
Oxf Med Case Reports. 2021 May 24;2021(5):omab026. doi: 10.1093/omcr/omab026. eCollection 2021 May.