Davey Barbara, Levin Enid, Iliffe Steve, Kharicha Kalpa
Nursing Research Unit, King's College, London, UK.
J Interprof Care. 2005 Jan;19(1):22-34. doi: 10.1080/1356182040021734.
In England, the theme of promoting collaborative working between social and primary health care remains high on the policy agenda. The underlying assumption, largely untested, is that a greater degree of structural integration benefits service users. This paper reports the findings from a feasibility study comparing two models of joint working and examining the relative impact of personal characteristics, service use and co-location on the likelihood of older people remaining in the community. Baseline standardised interviews with 79 older people aged 75 + with complex needs in two social services departments were carried out following referral, covering social circumstances, physical and mental health and services received, with follow-up interviews after six months. Contacts between social workers and primary care were tracked. The findings suggest that co-location does not necessarily lead to substantially closer interprofessional working in terms of greater contact between social workers and GPs or social workers and community nurses. Factors affecting outcome were degree of cognitive impairment, intensity of home care received and whether the older person lived alone. Whatever the model of collaborative working, its effects on remaining in the community must be assessed in the wider context of the characteristics and services received by older people.
在英格兰,促进社会保健与初级医疗保健之间合作的主题在政策议程上仍然占据重要位置。一个基本假设(很大程度上未经检验)是,更高程度的结构整合会使服务使用者受益。本文报告了一项可行性研究的结果,该研究比较了两种联合工作模式,并考察了个人特征、服务使用情况以及同址办公对老年人留在社区可能性的相对影响。在两个社会服务部门对79名75岁及以上有复杂需求的老年人进行了基线标准化访谈,访谈内容包括社会情况、身心健康状况以及接受的服务,在六个月后进行了随访访谈。跟踪了社会工作者与初级医疗保健之间的联系。研究结果表明,就社会工作者与全科医生或社会工作者与社区护士之间有更多接触而言,同址办公不一定会带来实质上更紧密的跨专业合作。影响结果的因素包括认知障碍程度、接受的家庭护理强度以及老年人是否独居。无论采用何种合作工作模式,都必须在老年人的特征和接受的服务这一更广泛背景下评估其对留在社区的影响。