• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Resuscitation of the preterm infant against parental wishes.违背父母意愿对早产儿进行复苏。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 May;90(3):F208-10. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.063420.
2
Miller v. HCA, Inc.
Wests South West Report. 2003;118:758-72.
3
Parents do not have authority to refuse to consent to resuscitation of fetus born alive. HCA, Inc. v. Miller.父母无权拒绝同意对出生时存活的胎儿进行复苏。HCA公司诉米勒案。
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2001 Summer;21(3):33-4. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.5600210308.
4
The "emergent circumstances" exception to the need for consent: the Texas Supreme Court ruling in Miller v. HCA.
J Perinatol. 2004 Jun;24(6):337-42. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211105.
5
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.
6
In re K.I.关于K.I.案
Atl Report. 1999 Jul 29;735:448-67.
7
Ethical dilemmas in the care of the most premature infants: the waters are murkier than ever.照料极早产儿过程中的伦理困境:情况比以往任何时候都更加复杂。
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2005 Apr;17(2):186-90. doi: 10.1097/01.mop.0000152996.58446.71.
8
A do not resuscitate order for an infant against parental wishes: a comment on the case of Child and Family Services of Central Manitoba v. R.L. and S.L.H.违背父母意愿为婴儿下达的“不要复苏”指令:对曼尼托巴省中部儿童与家庭服务局诉R.L.及S.L.H.一案的评论
Health Law J. 1999;7:205-31.
9
Current opinion in pediatrics: ethics and law 2001.《儿科学当前观点:伦理与法律》2001年版
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2002 Apr;14(2):170-3. doi: 10.1097/00008480-200204000-00005.
10
HCA, Inc. v. Miller.HCA公司诉米勒案。
Wests South West Report. 2000;36:187-99.

引用本文的文献

1
Maternal fetal medicine, obstetric, and neonatology perspectives on joint prenatal counseling at periviable gestational ages.母胎医学、产科学及新生儿学对孕极早期联合产前咨询的观点。
J Perinatol. 2025 Mar 17. doi: 10.1038/s41372-025-02260-x.
2
The patient/physician relationship in a post-Roe world: a neonatologist viewpoint.后罗诉韦德案时代的医患关系:新生儿科医生的观点。
J Perinatol. 2023 Jul;43(7):968-972. doi: 10.1038/s41372-022-01583-3. Epub 2022 Dec 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Extremely preterm birth and parental authority to refuse treatment--the case of Sidney Miller.极早早产与父母拒绝治疗的权利——西德尼·米勒案
N Engl J Med. 2004 Nov 11;351(20):2118-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMlim041201.
2
Delivery room decision-making at the threshold of viability.可存活临界期产房决策
J Pediatr. 2004 Oct;145(4):492-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.06.018.
3
Fetal infants: thoughts about what to do.死产儿:关于如何处理的思考。
Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):1819. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.1819.
4
Fetal infants: the fate of 4172 infants with birth weights of 401 to 500 grams--the Vermont Oxford Network experience (1996-2000).极低出生体重儿:4172名出生体重在401至500克之间婴儿的转归——佛蒙特牛津网络的经验(1996 - 2000年)
Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):1559-66. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.1559.
5
Medical malpractice.医疗事故
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jan 15;350(3):283-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr035470.
6
From the Johns Hopkins Baby to Baby Miller: what have we learned from four decades of reflection on neonatal cases?从约翰斯·霍普金斯医院的婴儿到米勒宝宝:四十年来对新生儿病例的反思让我们学到了什么?
J Clin Ethics. 2001 Fall;12(3):207-14.
7
The EPICure study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for infants born at the threshold of viability.EPICure研究:存活临界值出生婴儿的出院结局
Pediatrics. 2000 Oct;106(4):659-71. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.4.659.
8
Viability, morbidity, and resource use among newborns of 501- to 800-g birth weight. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network.出生体重501至800克新生儿的存活率、发病率及资源利用情况。美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所新生儿研究网络。
JAMA. 1996 Nov 27;276(20):1645-51.
9
Ethical issues in quadruple amputation in a child with meningococcal septic shock.一名患有脑膜炎球菌性败血症休克儿童进行四肢截肢的伦理问题。
J Perinatol. 1993 Jan-Feb;13(1):56-8.
10
Guarantee my child will be "normal" or stop all treatment.保证我的孩子会“正常”,否则就停止所有治疗。
J Perinatol. 1993 Nov-Dec;13(6):469-72.

违背父母意愿对早产儿进行复苏。

Resuscitation of the preterm infant against parental wishes.

作者信息

Paris J J, Schreiber M D, Elias-Jones A

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago Children's Hospital, IL 60637, USA.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 May;90(3):F208-10. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.063420.

DOI:10.1136/adc.2004.063420
PMID:15846009
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1721895/
Abstract

Over the past 40 years, the norms on who is to make treatment decisions for newborns, and on what standards, have been significantly altered and revised. Today the standard for treatment of newborns is the "best interest" of the child. A recent ruling of the Texas Supreme Court authorizing a doctor to resuscitate a potentially viable very premature newborn over the parents' objection is a challenge to that standard.

摘要

在过去40年里,关于由谁为新生儿做出治疗决策以及依据何种标准的规范,已经发生了显著变化和修订。如今,新生儿治疗的标准是孩子的“最大利益”。德克萨斯州最高法院最近做出的一项裁决,授权医生不顾父母反对对一名可能存活的极早产新生儿进行复苏,这对该标准构成了挑战。