Abraham P, Avenell A, Watson W A, Park C M, Bevan J S
Endocrinology, University of Aberdeen, Ward 27/28, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK, AB25 2ZN.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18(2):CD003420. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003420.pub3.
Antithyroid drugs are widely used in the therapy of hyperthyroidism. There are wide variations in the dose, regimen or duration of treatment used by health professionals.
To assess the effects of dose, regimen and duration of antithyroid drug therapy for Graves' hyperthyroidism.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central), MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, CINAHL, HEALTHSTAR, Current Controlled Trials and reference lists. We contacted investigators and hand searched conference abstracts. Most recent search: July 2004.
Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of antithyroid medication for Graves' hyperthyroidism were used.
Trial allocation to included, excluded and awaiting assessment categories was made by consensus. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Pooling of data for primary outcomes, and select exploratory analyses were undertaken.
Twenty-three randomised trials involving 3115 participants were included. Overall the quality of trials as reported was poor; specifically in terms of allocation concealment, assessor blinding and loss to follow-up. Four trials examined the effect of duration of therapy on relapse rates of Graves' hyperthyroidism. In one trial using the Titration regimen, longer duration therapy (18 months) had significantly fewer relapses (37% versus 58%) than six month therapy (Odds ratio (OR) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 0.96). In one quasi-randomised trial using the Block-Replace regimen, there was no significant difference between the six and 12 month (relapses rates 41% versus 35%) arms of the study. Extending the duration of therapy to over 18 months was not associated with improved relapse rates (Peto OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.43). Twelve trials examined the effect of Block-Replace versus Titration regimen. The relapse rates were similar in both groups at 51% in the Block-Replace group and 54% in the Titration group (Peto OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.08). Participants reporting rashes (10% versus 5%) and withdrawing due to side effects (16% versus 9%) were significantly higher in the Block-Replace group compared to the Titration group respectively. Three studies considered the addition of thyroxine with continued low dose antithyroid therapy after initial therapy with antithyroid drugs. There was significant heterogeneity between the studies and the difference between the two groups were not significant (Odds ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.05 to 6.21). Four studies considered the addition of thyroxine alone after initial therapy with antithyroid drugs. There was no significant difference in the relapse rates between the groups after 12 months follow-up with relapse rates being 31% (88/282) with thyroxine and 29% (82/284) with placebo (Peto OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.67).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence (based on four studies) suggests that the optimal duration of antithyroid drug therapy for the Titration regimen is 12 to 18 months. The six month Block-Replace regimen was found to be as effective as the 12 month treatment in one quasi-randomised study. The Titration (low dose) regimen had fewer adverse effects than the Block-Replace (high dose) regimen and was no less effective in trials (based on 12 trials) of equal duration. Continued thyroxine treatment following initial antithyroid therapy does not appear to provide any benefit in terms of recurrence of hyperthyroidism. The incidence of hypothyroidism was not reported and there were no deaths reported in the study populations.
抗甲状腺药物广泛应用于甲状腺功能亢进症的治疗。医疗专业人员使用的治疗剂量、方案或疗程存在很大差异。
评估抗甲状腺药物治疗格雷夫斯甲亢的剂量、方案和疗程的效果。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、EMBASE、BIOSIS、CINAHL、HEALTHSTAR、当前对照试验以及参考文献列表。我们联系了研究人员并手工检索了会议摘要。最近一次检索时间为2004年7月。
采用抗甲状腺药物治疗格雷夫斯甲亢的随机和半随机试验。
通过共识将试验分配到纳入、排除和待评估类别。两名评审员独立提取数据并评估试验质量。对主要结局进行数据合并,并进行了选定的探索性分析。
纳入了23项涉及3115名参与者的随机试验。总体而言,报告的试验质量较差;特别是在分配隐藏、评估者盲法和随访失访方面。四项试验研究了治疗疗程对格雷夫斯甲亢复发率的影响。在一项采用滴定方案的试验中,较长疗程治疗(18个月)的复发率(37%)显著低于六个月治疗(58%)(比值比(OR)0.42,95%置信区间(CI)0.18至0.96)。在一项采用阻断-替代方案的半随机试验中,该研究的六个月和十二个月组(复发率分别为41%和35%)之间没有显著差异。将治疗疗程延长至18个月以上与复发率改善无关(Peto OR 0.75,95% CI 0.39至1.43)。十二项试验研究了阻断-替代方案与滴定方案的效果。两组的复发率相似,阻断-替代组为51%,滴定组为54%(Peto OR 0.86,95% CI 0.68至1.08)。与滴定组相比,阻断-替代组报告皮疹的参与者(10%对5%)和因副作用退出的参与者(16%对9%)分别显著更高。三项研究考虑在抗甲状腺药物初始治疗后加用甲状腺素并继续低剂量抗甲状腺治疗。研究之间存在显著异质性,两组之间的差异不显著(比值比0.58,95% CI 0.05至6.21)。四项研究考虑在抗甲状腺药物初始治疗后单独加用甲状腺素。随访12个月后,两组的复发率没有显著差异,甲状腺素组为31%(88/282),安慰剂组为29%(82/284)(Peto OR 1.15,95% CI 0.79至1.67)。
证据(基于四项研究)表明,滴定方案的抗甲状腺药物治疗的最佳疗程为12至18个月。在一项半随机研究中,发现六个月的阻断-替代方案与十二个月的治疗效果相同。滴定(低剂量)方案的不良反应少于阻断-替代(高剂量)方案,并且在相同疗程的试验(基于12项试验)中效果不逊色。抗甲状腺初始治疗后继续使用甲状腺素治疗在甲亢复发方面似乎没有任何益处。未报告甲状腺功能减退的发生率,研究人群中也未报告死亡情况。