• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在终末期肝病模型(MELD)/儿童终末期肝病模型(PELD)系统下,肝移植存活率极高。

Excellent liver transplant survival rates under the MELD/PELD system.

作者信息

Freeman R B, Harper A, Edwards E B

机构信息

Division of Transplant Surgery, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, USA.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2005 Mar;37(2):585-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.099.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.099
PMID:15848465
Abstract

The MELD/PELD (M/P) system for liver allocation was implemented on February 27, 2002, in the United States. Since then sufficient time has elapsed to allow for assessment of posttransplant survival rates under this system. We analyzed 4163 deceased donor liver transplants performed between February 27, 2002, and December 31, 2003, for whom follow-up reporting was 95% and 67% complete at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed 1-year patient and graft survival rates for status 1 of 76.9% and 70.4%, respectively, and 87.3% and 82.9% for patients prioritized by M/P (P < .0001 for status 1 vs M/P). When adult candidates were stratified by MELD score quartile at transplant, 1-year survival rates were 89.5%, 88.3%, 86.6%, and 78.1% for lowest to highest quartile (P = .0002) and graft survival rates were similarly distributed (85.0%, 84.5%, 82.7%, 73.0%, P < .0001). Candidates with hepatocellular cancer (89.6%) and other MELD score exceptions (88.8%) had slightly higher 1-year survival rates compared with standard MELD recipients (86.0%), which did not reach statistical significance (P = .089). Pediatric recipients had slightly better patient (88.7%) and graft (86.5%) survival rates at 1 year than adults but there were no significant differences among the PELD strata due to small numbers of patients in each PELD quartile. We conclude that patient and graft survival have remained excellent since implementation of the MELD/PELD system. Although recipients with MELD scores in the highest quartile have reduced survival compared with other quartiles, their 1-year survival rate is acceptable when their extreme risk of dying without a transplant is taken into consideration.

摘要

美国于2002年2月27日实施了肝脏分配的终末期肝病模型/小儿终末期肝病模型(MELD/PELD,M/P)系统。自那时起,已有足够的时间来评估该系统下的移植后生存率。我们分析了2002年2月27日至2003年12月31日期间进行的4163例已故供体肝脏移植,6个月和12个月时随访报告的完整性分别为95%和67%。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,状态1患者和移植物的1年生存率分别为76.9%和70.4%,M/P优先排序患者的1年生存率分别为87.3%和82.9%(状态1与M/P相比,P<0.0001)。当成年候选者按移植时的MELD评分四分位数分层时,最低至最高四分位数的1年生存率分别为89.5%、88.3%、86.6%和78.1%(P=0.0002),移植物生存率也呈类似分布(85.0%、84.5%、82.7%、73.0%,P<0.0001)。肝细胞癌患者(89.6%)和其他MELD评分例外患者(88.8%)的1年生存率略高于标准MELD受者(86.0%),但未达到统计学显著性(P=0.089)。小儿受者1年时的患者生存率(88.7%)和移植物生存率(86.5%)略高于成人,但由于每个PELD四分位数中的患者数量较少,PELD各分层之间无显著差异。我们得出结论,自MELD/PELD系统实施以来,患者和移植物的生存率一直保持良好。尽管MELD评分处于最高四分位数的受者与其他四分位数相比生存率有所降低,但考虑到他们在不进行移植情况下极高的死亡风险,其1年生存率是可以接受的。

相似文献

1
Excellent liver transplant survival rates under the MELD/PELD system.在终末期肝病模型(MELD)/儿童终末期肝病模型(PELD)系统下,肝移植存活率极高。
Transplant Proc. 2005 Mar;37(2):585-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.099.
2
Liver transplantation in the United States.美国的肝脏移植
Clin Transpl. 2005:17-28.
3
An analysis of liver transplant survival rates from the UNOS registry.对器官共享联合网络(UNOS)登记处肝移植存活率的分析。
Clin Transpl. 2008:19-34.
4
UNOS Liver Registry: ten year survivals.器官共享联合网络肝脏登记处:十年生存率
Clin Transpl. 2006:29-39.
5
Prognostic value of MELD score and donor quality in liver transplantation: implications for the donor recipient match.
Transplant Proc. 2006 May;38(4):1059-62. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.03.008.
6
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and organ allocation from cadaveric donors for 198 liver transplantation procedures performed in a single center.在一个单一中心进行的198例肝移植手术中,终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分与尸体供体的器官分配情况。
Transplant Proc. 2008 Jul-Aug;40(6):1903-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.05.016.
7
Model for end-stage liver disease: impact of the new deceased donor liver allocation policy in São Paulo, Brazil.终末期肝病模型:巴西圣保罗新的脑死亡供体肝脏分配政策的影响
Transplant Proc. 2009 Jan-Feb;41(1):226-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.09.059.
8
Short-term postliver transplant survival after the introduction of MELD scores for organ allocation in the United States.在美国引入终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分用于器官分配后肝移植术后的短期生存情况。
Liver Int. 2005 Jun;25(3):536-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2005.01011.x.
9
The pediatric end-stage liver disease (PELD) model as a predictor of survival benefit and posttransplant survival in pediatric liver transplant recipients.小儿终末期肝病(PELD)模型作为小儿肝移植受者生存获益和移植后生存的预测指标。
Liver Transpl. 2006 Mar;12(3):475-80. doi: 10.1002/lt.20703.
10
Expanded criteria donor grafts for deceased donor liver transplantation under the MELD system: a decision analysis.终末期肝病模型(MELD)系统下用于尸体供肝移植的扩大标准供体移植物:一项决策分析
Liver Transpl. 2004 Dec;10(12):1468-75. doi: 10.1002/lt.20304.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical outcome of 1,000 consecutive cases of liver transplantation: a single center experience.1000例连续肝移植病例的临床结果:单中心经验
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2018 Nov;95(5):267-277. doi: 10.4174/astr.2018.95.5.267. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
2
Model for end-stage liver disease score and MELD exceptions: 15 years later.终末期肝病模型评分与MELD例外情况:15年后
Hepatol Int. 2015 Jul;9(3):346-54. doi: 10.1007/s12072-015-9631-3. Epub 2015 May 28.
3
Predicting survival after liver transplantation based on pre-transplant MELD score: a systematic review of the literature.
基于移植前 MELD 评分预测肝移植后的生存率:文献系统评价。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 12;8(12):e80661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080661. eCollection 2013.
4
Model for end-stage liver disease: end of the first decade.终末期肝病模型:第一个十年结束。
Clin Liver Dis. 2011 Nov;15(4):685-98. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
5
Hyponatremia and mortality among patients on the liver-transplant waiting list.肝移植等待名单上患者的低钠血症与死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 4;359(10):1018-26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0801209.
6
[Model for end-stage liver disease. New basis of allocation for liver transplantations].[终末期肝病模型。肝移植分配的新基础]
Chirurg. 2008 Feb;79(2):157-63. doi: 10.1007/s00104-008-1463-4.
7
Liver transplantation organ allocation between Child and MELD.
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2006 Jul;156(13-14):410-5. doi: 10.1007/s10354-006-0317-2.