Heymann H O
Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Br Dent J. 2005 Apr 23;198(8):514. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4812298.
Since the introduction of nightguard vital bleaching (tray bleaching) in 1989, dentistry has witnessed an astronomical rise in the interest in tooth whitening.(1) As a result, the most frequently asked question is, 'what bleaching technique works best?' Virtually all of today's whitening approaches work, because bleach is bleach. Whether a nightguard bleach is used with only 10% carbamide peroxide (which contains only 3% hydrogen peroxide), over-the-counter (OTC) whitening strips are applied containing 6% hydrogen peroxide, or an in-office bleach is employed using 25-35% hydrogen peroxide, the end results can potentially be the same. Similarity of results is possible because the mechanism of action is the same: oxidation of organic pigments or chromogens in the tooth. Granted, some bleaching approaches are more expeditious than others, owing to differences in concentration or exposure time. But as just noted, the most important factors in the efficacy of any bleaching treatment are concentration of the bleaching agent and duration of the exposure time.
自1989年夜用护齿美白法(托盘美白法)问世以来,牙科领域对牙齿美白的关注度急剧上升。(1)因此,最常被问到的问题是:“哪种美白技术效果最佳?”事实上,如今几乎所有的美白方法都有效,因为漂白剂就是漂白剂。无论是使用仅含10%过氧化脲(仅含3%过氧化氢)的夜用护齿美白剂,还是使用含6%过氧化氢的非处方(OTC)美白牙贴,亦或是采用含25 - 35%过氧化氢的诊室美白法,最终效果都可能相同。结果相似是因为作用机制相同:牙齿中有机色素或色原的氧化。诚然,由于浓度或接触时间的差异,某些美白方法比其他方法更迅速。但如前所述,任何漂白治疗效果的最重要因素是漂白剂的浓度和接触时间的长短。